Templot logo

Templot Club Archive - Search Results

To search again, click the Back button in your browser.


Search results for: attach_6_sncf_sleepers.jpg outside

No results found containing all search terms. 308 results found containing some search terms.

16 pages of results.
... : 15 May 2020 12:05 from: KeithArmes Hi Rich, I think that looks as good as you are going to get, unless anybody knows more about catch points inside a turnout. Possible that the two catch points are in line, sharing the same space for the tiebar drive rods. Keith posted: 16 May 2020 21:01 from: Richard Brummitt Thanks Keith, for taking another look. I wondered about the rodding sharing a gap but decided that most of these that I've seen have them separate with the outside one closer to the the main line. The angle is different for each and I guess that makes space an issue where they come through the timber gap at an angle. They would both operate from the same lever, along with the turnout in the main line, but the rod must be separated at some place for the same reason. I've done another print out. I find it easier to see things than on the screen. I guess I should also reduce the timber spacing to 2'1" in the lead where ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  56k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3657.php
... it will start playing.) For a prototype map what you do need is enough understanding of prototype track to interpret the map. Unless it is a large scale track plan from the railway company, it is likely to have been drawn by an OS surveyor on the ground rather than a permanent-way engineer in the design office. So for example it is likely to have the switch toe position marked (blade tips) and the crossing nose position, rather than the rail joints, and for some complex formations such as outside slips and tandem turnouts, quite often the surveyor gets the rails a bit muddled. This topic discusses determining turnout sizes from a map: topic 3095- message 22216 topic 3095- message 22326 For some notes about matching the radius of a template to a background map or other guide, see: http://templot.com/companion/swell_function_ctrl_f10.php You may also find the wrap function relevant: http://templot.com/companion/wrap_picture_shape_to_curve.php The original topic about the automated background maps function is here: topic 3051 The relevant ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  51k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3444.php
... topic: 3439 Lewes Station early 1900's posted: 26 May 2019 10:49 from: roythebus Found this interestin pic of Lewes on a Facebook group. There's a nice tandem with outside slip. Attachment: attach_2836_3439_60385037_10156412 328496909_7235413923883646976_n.jp g 229 Parts of Templot Club may not function unless you enable JavaScript (also called Active Scripting) in your browser. Templot Club> Forums> Prototype pics> Lewes Station early 1900's about Templot Club Templot Companion- User Guide- A-Z Index Templot Explained for beginners Please click: important information for new members and first-time visitors. indexing link for search engines back to top of page Please read this important note about copyright: Unless stated otherwise, all the files submitted to this web site are copyright and the property of the respective contributor. You are welcome to use them for your own personal non-commercial purposes, and in your messages on this web site. If you want to publish any of this material elsewhere or use it commercially, you must first obtain the owner's permission to do so. The small ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  11k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3439.php
... radius is 48". Hi Richard, I don't see the problem? Switched K-crossings make a slip 10 times easier to build (no K-crossing check rails), especially in a fiddle yard where you don't have to match any prototype appearance. You just need to fork out for 2 extra point motors. Unless I'm missing something, your design looks fine? I have quickly added the double slip roads for you. I staggered the slip switches to make it easier to create an opening clearance for them. Outside slip switches are 1:40. Inside slip switches are 1:32. Group .box file attached. regards, Martin. Attachment: attach_2355_2947_group_2016_12_13 _0115_28.box 251 posted: 13 Dec 2016 11:24 from: Tony W Hi Richard. Your plan also looks fine to me. I have built several switched diamonds over the years and as Martin has stated found them easier to build than fixed obtuse crossings, as there are fewer rails to align in that critical area. I think you are being overly concerned. It is possible ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  18k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_2947.php
... and b. you zoom out further than the rectangle. If you zoom inside the rectangle you won't see any difference from using the rectangle, it should be faster than before regardless. But only for large track plans. If you have a high-end fast system, the improvement may be only minor. It is definitely making a difference here. cheers, Martin. yes, I did all that, interestingly, since I have long templates, the bounding rectangle, only removes a certain number of templates that fall completely outside the rectangle I dont really notice any improvements, lag on scrolling still remains an issue, but only if I attempt to scroll too fast.( 2.7Ghx 4 core i5, 16 GB ram, running native windows 7 in Parallels under OSX !! !, 27-inch (2560 x 1440) AMD Radeon HD 6770M 512Mb video ram) thanks again dave Last edited on 12 Feb 2018 23:52 by madscientist posted: 13 Feb 2018 00:03 from: Martin Wynne Hi Dave, If you are using Parallels ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  124k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3214.php
... You need to be clear which radius you are comparing. I think you made a typo in your screenshot, the usual USA heel offset (" spread") is 6.25" not 6.5". regards, Martin. posted: 28 Oct 2016 22:23 from: Dave Phillips Hi Martin, The sk81 file is attached. Yes, I'm trying to match a Fast Tracks template/fixture. I'll change to CLM. I'll work on vertex length as well. This suggests that the Templot template switch blade tips should be outside the FT template blade tips. Is this correct? The blunt nose is already 1/2 inch in the provided box file. Yes, the heel offset is 6.25, not 6.5. I had previously read about the blunt nose radius and heel offset for US turnouts, but missed the CLM and vertex length. Thanks again, Dave Attachment: attach_2340_2936_HOn3_#6_from_DG_16_10_28_1311_36.sk81 257 posted: 29 Oct 2016 15:23 from: Dave Phillips If I did the math correctly, the vertex length is about 2.5 inches (actual ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  49k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_2936.php
... from: Martin Wynne Also new in 226a is an option to mark specific timbers on a template by modifying the infill colour: 2_060828_490000000.png There are several reasons why you might want to mark specific timbers on the template. For example the position of dropper wires, rodding runs, etc. However, this is primarily for those modellers who like to use a hybrid form of construction, with most timbers in say wood or plastic, and a few interspersed in copper-clad for soldering. This is a popular form of construction used outside the UK for flat-bottom track. It's helpful to mark the appropriate timbers at the design stage, and I've been asked for this option on the templates. Bear in mind that once the timbers have been stuck on the template, you can't see the colours. So this option is primarily for use when actually sticking them on. Print a second template for reference if you need to see the colours afterwards. I have a hunch this will turn out to be another one of those functions which we didn't know we ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  18k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3661.php
... for documentation Dave Last edited on 11 Nov 2017 12:00 by madscientist posted: 11 Nov 2017 12:25 from: Martin Wynne madscientist wrote: If you are looking for" screen time" I would( humbly) suggest that a updated series of videos, on issues like tandems, and other more esoteric things are a better application of your time Hi Dave, Yes, I'm aware of that. Unfortunately producing smooth-running videos takes up days and weeks of my time. I do like to have a life outside of Templot. The live sessions were intended to be a stopgap until better videos are available. Also I'm getting a bit fed up with the constant request for help with tandem turnouts from folks who haven't yet got to grips with the basics of Templot. A viable tandem turnout is at the top end of track design. I have posted some guidance notes for tandems, see: topic 2394- message 16119 I will make a new tandem video, but not yet. My priority is to progress the Templot Explained beginners section ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  43k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3122.php
... I can do. regards, Martin. posted: 1 Nov 2015 12:38 from: madscientist Thanks. Martin The context menu placing didn't occur in my older version, right now even moving the application window doesn't un stick the context menu position. As a general comment any free floating menu should be resizeable and movable. Simply because with modern desktops, you have a plethora of widgets and screen" gadgets" that typical sit on the top Z layer obliterating anything under them. This is especially true of menus that float outside the main application screen. X Windows applications suffer the same issues these days as the modern desktop is a bit different from when X Windows was conceived. Regards posted: 1 Nov 2015 14:03 from: Martin Wynne madscientist wrote: The context menu placing didn't occur in my older version, right now even moving the application window doesn't un stick the context menu position. Hi Dave, I haven't made any changes, so if the behaviour has changed it must be your Mac doing that. But I have now - ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  21k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_2770.php
... topic: 4 SNCF sleepers posted: posted: 14 May 2007 02:46 from: BernieM4 The photograph, taken in April this year shows a track of one of the main platforms of Nice SNCF railway station. The wooden sleepers appear to be 'rough hewn' with some repairs visible. A TGV had just departed the station using this track. Does anyone know of sleepers anything like this in the UK? Attachment: attach_6_sncf_sleepers.jpg 195 posted: posted: 18 May 2007 17:04 from: Steve Stubbs I don't know about the UK, but I have some photos somewhere of French sleepers taken in Alsace some years back. They were on a secondary line, and were in effect simply round tree trucks with a flat cut out under each rail where the flatbottom rail was simply spiked through. regards Steve Stubbs Parts of Templot Club may not function unless you enable JavaScript (also called Active Scripting) in your browser. Templot Club> Forums> Templot talk> SNCF sleepers about Templot Club Templot Companion- User Guide- A-Z Index Templot ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  13k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_4.php
... topic: 2738 Forum issues today posted: 27 Aug 2015 21:30 from: Martin Wynne Apologies if Templot Club has been a bit slow today. Message from Jim: "Sorry, our equipment is running fine but the data centre is having 'Tier 3 provider' connection issues today. There is nothing they can do about it. This has affected not only the central Ohio data centre but dozens of others across the USA. All our servers are running fine, it is the pipe going to the outside world which is clogged in places." Martin. Parts of Templot Club may not function unless you enable JavaScript (also called Active Scripting) in your browser. Templot Club> Forums> Templot talk> Forum issues today about Templot Club Templot Companion- User Guide- A-Z Index Templot Explained for beginners Please click: important information for new members and first-time visitors. indexing link for search engines back to top of page Please read this important note about copyright: Unless stated otherwise, all the files submitted to this web ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  11k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_2738.php
... into a new one for another try. When you have successfully twisted a bitmap image to the correct angle, it is useful to save it from Templot and then open it in a program such as Windows Paint to crop off the unwanted white corners. Then create a new picture shape to contain it and complete the process of shifting it into alignment with the others. If the FONTS/ COLOURS tab> PAD SHAPES LINE WIDTH option is set to 1, any border lines are entirely within the image area, not around the outside of it. This means that when aligning two images side-by-side with the mouse action, the border lines should also be side-by-side, not overlapping. (If the line width is set to more than 1, the border lines should overlap by half the additional width.) When aligning images it may be helpful to de-select the borders (PICTURE SHAPES tab). N.B. Please bear in mind that Templot is not fully-fledged graphics imaging software- this "bare- ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  195k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1199.php
... , inverted hand bottom. Alan Probably because I haven't a clue as to what I'm doing like I've previously said lol I thought to myself that if I had an 8' radius curve and I wanted a 6' radius curve coming off this to the right of it then it would make it a R/H turnout. Or am I being stupid? Again? regards, Mark posted: 27 Oct 2009 00:15 from: Martin Wynne Hi Mark, If your mainline radius is 8ft, any diverging track on the outside curving in the same direction must have a radius larger than 8ft. That's not Templot -- it's ordinary geometry. It can only be 6ft radius if it curves in the opposite direction, creating a Y-turnout effect. Is that what you want? regards, Martin. posted: 27 Oct 2009 00:23 from: marsa69 Thanks for your help Martin. But it doesn't matter now. I'll just use a standard B8 L/H turnout and see where that takes me, regards, Mark posted: 27 ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  85k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_951.php
... :25 from: Josh C Looks great thanks, Could you attach the file so I can open it and have a closer look? posted: 25 Oct 2009 12:35 from: Alan Turner I didn't keep the original so I've done it again. Alan Attachment: attach_671_961_Curved_tandem_LH_- _LH.box 290 posted: 25 Oct 2009 17:44 from: Josh C Thanks Alan, I loaded it up and took a look at it, but to my understanding (may be my mathematics is wrong but on my drawing the outside radius should be 42 but on your plan it was 119" the middle radius was 48" and the bottom one is right Say it might be my mathematics or understanding, but if someone could let me know that would be great. Thanks again Josh posted: 25 Oct 2009 19:45 from: Paul Boyd Hi Josh There's a couple of issues here. The first is that prototype track doesn't have a radius as such- a turnout will be expressed in terms of the crossing angle and switch type. Not withstanding ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  27k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_961.php
... was to keep the rails all in the same plane using very long sleepers under all tracks. However "British Railways Track" has pictures (1st Edn Pg 68) of some "two level" chairs introduced by the LMS where the base of the chair under the rail was thicker than normal to preserve the vertical alignment. The use of these meant the six foot way had to be increased in width. Perhaps Martin or someone can explain furtheer, please? The worse case is double junctions where the branch is on the outside of the curve, but itself curves in the same direction as the main. Care has to be taken to avoid the branch rail on the inside of the curve becoming higher than the outer rail of the branch. posted: 29 Oct 2009 18:03 from: Alan McMillan Hi John Your last point is interesting. There used to be a very strange arrangement at Carstairs Junction on the Scottish Region in the 1970s where the Edinburgh branch track deviated from the up main platform road which had a 6 inch cant deficiency for ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  33k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_966.php
... S wrote: I'm really struggling to read the small page numbers on my full size track plan. By this I mean the w16, w17 etc that appears in the top right and bottom left of the printed sheets. Hi Gordon, I'm sorry, this font size is hard-coded, there isn't a setting to change it. I made the corner texts intentionally small because they are within the finished template area and might obscure important detail if too large. Note that the page number is also printed in a larger font outside the trim margin in the bottom left corner. The best I can suggest is that you read that and write it on the template area before trimming off the margins. No-one has mentioned this before, and when I coded it 10 years ago it looked fine. Looking at it again now with eyes 10 years older (my eyes are the same age as yours ), I can see that it might be a problem. I will do something about this in the next upgrade. Thanks for drawing my attention ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  15k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_973.php
... topic: 990 FS0 B6 Double Slip problem posted: 17 Dec 2009 17:47 from: awhite Please can anyone of you experts help me. I thought I had managed my first fine scale 0 gauge double slip to go with a B6 turnout. But I seem to have lost part of it and I've now spent ages trying to recover the lost parts, but just keep remaking existing parts. Any suggestions or help to finish it again welcome? And does anyone have a box file of a similar size and scale B6 outside slip/scissors (I'm not sure of terminology) Tony[img]" Attachment: attach_704_990_Double_slip_B6_unde r_construction.box 278 posted: 17 Dec 2009 19:36 from: Alan McMillan Hi Tony I've completed the slip for you. The K crossing wing rails will need to be slightly modified at their ends since they foul the slip roads at the moment because of their length. Regards Alan McMillan Attachment: attach_705_990_Slip_Query.box 360 posted: 17 Dec 2009 21:56 from: awhite Alan McMillan wrote: Hi Tony I've completed the slip for you ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  29k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_990.php
... / transition to take it where I need it. I rarely if ever use a constant radius other than the corners of my hidden spiral. I would generate the inside one larger than a quadrant. Set it in the corner and store. I then generate a straight template and overlay it visually to align with the curve. Get a pair of sleepers overlaid exactly to ensure the join is perfect and then F3 to shorten it. Flip back to the curve and adjust length using F3. Set up the parallel curve for the outside and job done, so no F7 in that case. Now something perhaps slightly different. If I have say an engine shed, I will put it where I need it on the layout and add a straight template which has been rotated to the right position. If I cannot get the branch track to align with the straight smoothly then I'll start from both ends as it were and extend both pieces of curved track until they are overlaid, one on top of the other and tweak them with F6 until I get the ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  125k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1054.php
... bit of the West Yard i can't see building it...Shame Thanks Anyway Mark posted: 14 Mar 2010 22:26 from: Martin Wynne Mark Leigh wrote: I haven't loaded the .bmp file as that is also too large 60.4MB (10.4MB when zipped). Not sure if there's anything else i can try? On the .bmp the problem area in question doesn't look like a slip but it seems to work. Hi Mark, It's most likely an inside slip. It could be a half-scissors or an outside slip. Do you have any photos of the area? I've added the slip road for you -- file attached. Try saving the .bmp as a 256-colour (8 -bit) indexed PNG file. It will be very much smaller. It's not usable in Templot in that format, but we can easily save it again as a .bmp after downloading. regards, Martin. Attachment: attach_765_1078_tonbridge __curved_slip_3000_7p5.box 279 posted: 14 Mar 2010 22:57 from: Mark Leigh Hi Martin, As requested a .png file ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  25k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1078.php
... : 15 Mar 2010 19:00 from: Dellboy polybear wrote: Hi all, If a length of plain trackwork is made by placing sleepers in a straight jig (based on Templot sleeper spacings) and then attaching one rail (by whatever is your chosen method) to those sleepers, then if that piece of trackwork is removed from the jig and subsequently curved and placed over a curved Templot Template then can anyone tell me if the Sleepers will now match the positions on the curved template Brian In the real world providing the outside rail (of the curve) is the rail soldered first then the sleeper spacings will be correct. This is based on a standard 60 foot track panel. The inner rail (of the curve) would have to be suitably shortened to maintain square rail joints at the end(s) of the panel. Templot should reflect the resultant sleeper spacings on a curved template but I do not know if this is the case. Derek posted: 15 Mar 2010 20:00 from: Martin Wynne Dellboy wrote: Templot should ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  23k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1079.php
Result Pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next >>


Search took 0.099 seconds


Back to Templot Club