Templot Club Archive - Search Results
To search again, click the Back button in your browser.
Search results for: include
846 results found.
43 pages of results.
... blade tips is in the order of 2.2mm. I uderstand that (from a posting by Martin): "For nearly all UK switches, the points opening at the tip is 4.1/4 ", and the minimum clearance anywhere along the open switch rail (point) is 2".- This scales (in 4mm) at 1.42mm at the tip, with a minimum clearance along the switch rail of 0.67mm. Whilst I'm happy with the clearance figure of 0.85mm I've achieved (I'm using 00/EM profile wheelsets, including modern RTR wheelsets) I'm a little concerned about the resulting tip clearance of 2.2mm. The curvature of the blades matches the Templot template, so am I doing anything wrong or are my figures to be considered "the norm" please? Is the figure of 1.42mm (or close to) actually achievable whilst at the same time maintaining minimum clearance along the blade? Many thanks. Brian posted: 6 Feb 2011 00:00 from: Jim Guthrie polybear wrote:- This scales (in 4mm) at 1.42mm at the ...
... the link, in my email... topic_860&forum_id=5 &jump_to=5633 It does seem strange that if I copy and paste the link, it does take me to this post and not the top of the page. posted: 3 Nov 2009 01:52 from: Martin Wynne Hi Dean, Thanks for posting those details. Your problem is in Windows Mail. It is truncating the URL at the anchor (the bit at the end after the #) when it parses the link, instead of including it. The only suggestion I can make is to copy and paste the link into your browser instead of simply clicking it. Make sure that what you are copying includes the #p.... bit on the end. Or to not use Windows Mail. If you normally view emails as HTML you could try changing to viewing emails as plain text (which is much safer). But all emails from Templot Club are plain text anyway, so that shouldn't really make any difference. All the above also applies ...
... printed pages are not quite as neat, but the Foxit reader seems to be more tolerant of odd-sized PDF files, and very large pages. Free download from: http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/reader/reader4.php The big problem I have is that things tend to work fine here when I test them (on 3 different computers), but users then report difficulties doing exactly the same thing. Unless I can reproduce the problem here, it is almost impossible to investigate. That's one reason why I have included native PDF files from Templot in the next Pug. I've tested creating large PDF files with included full-size background scans, and so far it is all working fine. The created PDFs can be printed from both the Adobe and Foxit readers. Here for example is part of a scanned picture shape of 3496 x 1348 pixels, stretched to a page 5000mm (197") x 2000mm (79"). This is the 600dpi PDF created from Templot, opened in Adobe Reader 10 (Adobe Reader X) on ...
124. PDF Export origin
... write more about that when I have done some more testing. Attached below is your plan as a 2-page PDF at 100 DPI (3MB), zoom out to about 10% to see it properly. regards, Martin. Attachment: attach_1610_2229_arthur_pdf_100dpi _2pages.pdf 389 posted: 6 Jun 2013 01:49 from: Martin Wynne Hi Arthur, Hmm. I think I have boxed myself into a corner on this and then opened a can of worms when I got there. I was aware when I introduced recently the option to include sketchboard items in the output that there would be some size limits on each item, and I did a lot of testing. But I didn't properly allow for the effect of that in the larger scales. The reason that your PDF is failing is that some of your sketchboard items are over the size limit -- the road features, for example. At 600 DPI any item much over 1000mm* in width or depth is likely to fail. That can be increased by reducing the DPI, but it is still unacceptably ...
125. Blackwell Road
... holding sidings, the track above it exits to the hidden storage. The first point (C10) serves the TMD which features a two road shed, refueling road/ head-shunt and a siding (A7) for a couple of TTA wagons of diesel. I'd like to hear any comments and suggestions regarding tidying up the plan. And while I'm without doubt that the overall plan is highly unrealistic, I'd appreciate input as to anything I can do to increase realism overall. For instance, I'm not sure if I should include a trap point on the main exit from the shed. I'm planning on having a small ground frame to operate the double slip and the shed point, with a leaver on extended timbers for the siding. Carlisle PSB would likely be in-charge of the C10 for shed access. I'd also be interested in the best way to operate the two crossovers which will be sandwiched between platforms, Any input greatly received. Regards Matt Attachment: attach_703_987_Blackwell_Road_5a.b ox 408 Last edited on 10 Dec 2009 01:50 by ClikC posted: ...
126. Catch Points
... topic: 2078 Catch Points posted: 10 Oct 2012 15:53 from: MarkAustin I've just started to use Templot in anger, and have succesfully created a number of templates, including two for Catch/Trap points. These have two switch rails, but I only want a single switch rail. How do I delete the other rail? posted: 10 Oct 2012 16:25 from: Phil O Hi Mark I've just started to use Templot in anger, and have succesfully created a number of templates, including two for Catch/Trap points. These have two switch rails, but I only want a single switch rail. How do I delete the other rail? DO- OMIT- RAILS AND JOINT MARKS. On the right hand side of the menu are the turnout rails select as required by UN-TICKING THE BOXES to delete what's not required. Cheers Phil posted: 10 Oct 2012 16:52 from: Martin Wynne Hi Mark, Catch points are one of the few topics so far included on the new Templot Companion web site ...
... files will get saved -- a .bgs file containing the dimensions of the picture shape, and an .sk81 file containing the actual image in png format. 2. To restore your background shapes next time click the reload... button. regards, Martin. posted: 1 Apr 2014 17:25 from: Hayfield Martin Again thank you. Am I correct in thinking that you save once you have resized it (if that is the correct term) to match Templot. Secondly is it possible to print a hard copy including the background as well as the track plan posted: 1 Apr 2014 21:36 from: Martin Wynne Hayfield wrote: Am I correct in thinking that you save once you have resized it (if that is the correct term) to match Templot? Hi John, Yes, any changes you make to the size or position of the image are saved in the .bgs file. Secondly is it possible to print a hard copy including the background as well as the track plan? Yes. But take care. To include ...
... topic: 2031 Running without internet access posted: 26 Jul 2012 09:30 from: John Clutterbuck I have aware that TDV used to check the internet connection on startup and I could see the sense in this as it evolved. However, I also recall a statement that the final Templot 2 version would not do this. The latest version seems to me to becoming a more official Templot 2 version but it still includes the internet check on startup. I also note this is covered in the T&Cs. Whilst I agree that we should all be using the latest version the inability to run without an internet connection is very limiting. I often work away from home and with evenings spare and no model to work on, it is one of the best opportunities for me to do design work. Unfortunately I often stay in places without free internet access. I would like to suggest that if Templot cannot confirm it is the latest option at least it should give the user the opportunity to continue working with it. This would perhaps overcome the ...
... output> enlarge/reduce size for print and PDF> menu options: 2_210811_590000000.png These settings apply to printed output and exported PDF files. regards, Martin. posted: 21 Jul 2012 15:14 from: Martin Wynne p.s. Keith, A few further points arising from your message. 1. You seem to be using the PDF printer on the Mac, and creating a custom form? There is no need to do that because Templot has its own PDF engine which can easily create PDF files to any page size, including large sizes for full-size layout printing on roll paper: 2_210936_450000000.png Clicking that menu item 1 displays this dialog: 2_210936_470000002.png on which you can easily set up your 1680 x 1188 mm page sizes in the boxes shown. 2. For a small-scale mock-up you may prefer to output in diagram mode, for a bolder diagram, like this: 2_210936_480000003.png You can change to and fro between the normal detail mode and diagram mode on the print pages dialog: 2_210936_460000001.png If you need to see the position of ...
... as a guide in the background shapes. See this page for an example of that: http://www.templot.com/dummy/rene_tandem.htm You can of course use the rails from flexi-track to build pointwork, but it is an expensive way of buying rail. There are other sources of suitable rail. Unfortunately the archive site on RMweb is currently offline, but should be back soon. However, quite a lot of it is available in Google's cache. Here for example is a topic about handbuilding N Gauge track, including some details of rail supplies: (Copy and paste this link into your browser): http://209.85.229.132/search?q =cache:bAChMhlxO74J:www.rmweb.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php%3Ff%3D5%26t%3D37908 regards, Martin. posted: 11 Jan 2010 18:01 from: Jim Guthrie Kenneth Beckett wrote: Firstly I am not working in fine scale because I have a large quantity of track, locomotives and rolling stock and really don't want to throw it all away or get involved in conversion ...
... area to date) ready for a start on the real trackwork for TG. As a member of two Scalefour Society area groups I recently took along a suitable baseframe and Templot print section in the hope of canvassing opinion for a test track build 2297_091103_500000000.jpg The members of the S4 area group felt that a challenging test track build was the way to go and I therefore chose the above section. This won't be used on the layout, rather I can test various methods of attaching the track to the aluminium sheet/cork baseframe and include some practice of building track on plywood baulks (as this style of trackwork will feature on the two large viaducts of TG). There were various admiring comments re the ambition of the trackwork and the work done with the trackplan thus far. However, the knowledgeable track builders amongst them quickly observed that there were several unsupported 'V's within the outside double slip undefined 2297_091115_510000000.jpg Please study the above close up and advise whether the timbers can be positioned to properly support all 'V's. A larger version is in the Image Gallery at: ...
132. Lancaster Green Ayre
... still want to try and keep the transition curve. I've attached the latest box and background files. Thanks in advance Jamie I've now had a go and think that I've cracked it it may not be very elegant and up to Martin's standards but it looks OK to my eyes. the latest .box file is attached. The reason I've had to sort this out is that I've just managd to obtain a set of the original contract drawings for the Overhead line equipment dated 1907. These show every structure on the route in great detail including many details of the station and awning as well as all the steelwork. I realised that the masts are going to have to be very well fixed to the boards and realised that that area was a bit tight. Sorry if I've wasted anyone's time anyone about. Jamie Attachment: attach_700_948_green_ayre_09_12_08 _2151_55.box 379 posted: 8 Dec 2009 22:58 from: Jim Guthrie Jamie92208 wrote I've now had a go and think that I've cracked it it may not be very elegant and up to Martin's standards but it looks OK to my eyes ...
... topic: 2589 Track Spacing in Stations posted: 3 Dec 2014 23:55 from: Godfrey Earnshaw I base my trackwork designs on the accepted default recommended distances of 6ft and 10ft separation. By this I mean straight parallel tracks will have a nominal 6ft way and tracks then the tracks outside this will have a 10ft way as will goods sidings. However, I also separate my tracks by 10ft in passenger stations, including terminals. This is my assumption, based on the possible requirement for staff to need access to couplings and hoses when joining/separating vehicles. Is my assumption correct? Thank you Godders posted: 4 Dec 2014 08:15 from: Martin Wynne Godfrey Earnshaw wrote: I base my trackwork designs on the accepted default recommended distances of 6ft and 10ft separation. By this I mean straight parallel tracks will have a nominal 6ft way and tracks then the tracks outside this will have a 10ft way as will goods sidings. However, I also separate my tracks by 10ft in passenger stations, including terminals. This is my assumption, ...
... get some better flow through the point work and get away from just connecting turnouts end to end. I have attached a box file containing the station approach tracks. Try as I may, I have an alignment problem between the Down Main and the crossing over the branch track. I have spent the day on this so far but could not correct it. Can anyone help me here please? Now for the Sketchboard issue- Since making partial templates, the sketchboard seems not to recognise all the track work. I have not included this file as it can easily be reproduced from the .box file. Can anyone help me with this too? Many thanks Peter Attachment: attach_1783_2425_Station_approach _2014_03_10_2255_33.box 263 posted: 17 Mar 2014 11:00 from: Paul Boyd Hi Peter The easy answer first- the Sketchboard needs full templates to work so complex formations will usually just show as a gap. I don't really use the Sketchboard, but if I wanted this for a control panel or whatever, I would create rails-only full templates over the top of the partial ...
135. Windows 7 Ultimate
... just have too much stuff that won't work. I've even reverted my desktop PC back to XP after a brief dalliance with Vista. (Still happy with Vista on my laptop though) Cheers posted: 24 Jun 2009 21:46 from: John Lewis Paul wrote: My experiments with Windows 7 have ground to a halt as I just have too much stuff that won't work. I've even reverted my desktop PC back to XP after a brief dalliance with Vista. (Still happy with Vista on my laptop though) Does this include the Windows 7's "XP mode", please? So far I have not had to use Vista, so I was thinking that my next PC (in due course) might have Windows 7. posted: 24 Jun 2009 21:53 from: Martin Wynne Paul Boyd wrote: Having said that, I could see touch screens being used in conjunction with the Snap function to drag templates around, or to drag lengths or radii of templates so there is some potential there! Hi Paul, Hmm. I can see ...
... errors, such that it is impossible for two dimensions shown to be reconciled. 2_070542_140000000.png To answer your specific questions: Q1. The "1 /2 point of frog" is called the blunt nose. It is the width of the tip of the vee. In the UK it is not 1/2". For traditional UK bullhead track on non-GWR lines it is 3/4 ", which is the Templot default. This is the very first change you need to make, because it affects other things including the layout of the timbering: 2_071311_170000001.png The "theoretical point" is called the fine point (FP) or intersection: 2_160721_340000000.png The "point of switch" is called the toe. The lead lengths from the toe are shown in the information panel: 2_071311_170000000.png You need to scroll the information panel to see these. The dimensions are in model mm and will change as you adjust the turnout. You can't set them directly. Clearly the difference between these two leads, the distance from FP to blunt nose, called " ...
137. Another one lost
... but now since I have seen your "please test" thread, I can tell you why! No, Chrome is not my default browser, IE8 is and no, Javascript is not enabled in there. Sorry that I could have saved a lot of bother had I realised that scripting was the issue. Needless to say, the link works fine when Javascript is re-enabled. The good news is that the answer to your question is clearly "no" you do not need to test everything- your friends (including still me I hope!) are more than willing to help out! Now using Firefox BTW and pleased to see that the bug which caused me to ditch it has gone! Best wishes, Howard posted: 20 Jan 2014 08:05 from: JFS Nigel Brown wrote: Howard, I think we're going to have to agree to disagree. I see Templot as primarily a means of constructing templates from which track can be built, not as layout planning software. Hello Nigel, No, we are not in disagreement ...
... arranged with facing point access to the platform for incoming trains, but welcome being proved wrong. That's not a bay as such: it's a goods road with access from the platform, for the loading of such things as the products of the mills. Hope that helps: it is not impossible to resolve, with the platform on the arrival side and the main goods yard behind that, it would be plausible. Simon posted: 3 Jan 2014 20:25 from: Mythocentric Hi Martin Simon's already provided an answer so I've included a brief history which should explain my reasoning further. 44.67mm track spacing is first choice. As I mentioned I only used Anyrail with the intention of 'proving' the track plan which, unfortunately meant using Peco's finest (? )! It also helps in that like the original (built on a shelf between Oldham Road and the River Ryburn) I'm tight for space so every bit counts! The reason for 'flipping' the track plan is one of space. I live in an apartment and the only room I have for ...
... or pressing W) on the shove timber dialog: 2_290815_040000000.png To avoid having to do this on every template, you can make some changes before you start the track plan. Extend a good long length of approach and exit track on a turnout template, and widen all the joint sleepers. Tick the retain option boxes on the dialog above. Now you can shorten the turnout again for use. The shoved timbers will be retained in your subsequently stored templates, and reappear when required if you extend the length of them. This includes any plain track templates, which will use the widened sleepers from the approach track. An obvious omission from Templot is an option to automatically widen joint sleepers. It has been in my notebook for years. Maybe your message here will nudge me into doing something about it. edit: now done, see below. p.s. many companies which used 12" joint sleepers, also used special larger joint chairs on them. I don't know anyone who makes such chairs. regards, Martin. posted: 29 Mar 2015 13 ...
... . The other source is the OS maps for the area. West Midlands may well have an online mapping engine that has historic overlays like lancashire has, otherwise the Brimingham Cenral library will be a good place to start. Jamie Guest posted: 15 Apr 2010 17:26 from: Templot User Posted by email by Ian Jewell____ Wild Swan published a three part (so far) work on New Street, by Richard Foster. (Full title, Birmingham New Street, The Story of a Great Station, including Curzon Street.) Part 2, 1860 to 1923, and part 3, 1923 to 1947 both have track plans, not apparently altered much between 1920 and 1947, and part 2 also has a layout of platform level buildngs. Both lavishly illustrated. Part 2 published in 1990, ISBN 0 9068707907 Part 3 pub. 1997 ISBN 1 984103 37 2 regards Ian posted: 15 Apr 2010 19:46 from: Brian Nicholls Hi Ian, Thank you for your response, boy are you guys helpful. As strange as ...
Search took 0.088 seconds
Back to Templot Club