Templot logo

Templot Club Archive - Search Results

To search again, click the Back button in your browser.


Search results for: attach_2134_2692_post 7553 0 47801600 1389806732_thumb.jpg

1 result found containing all search terms. 428 results found containing some search terms.

22 pages of results.
... Which version of Templot are you using? Please bear in mind that the DXF import in Templot is very simple and will import only basic 2D line and arc entities, and all blocks must be exploded when saving the DXF file. If you post again and attach your DXF file, we can perhaps see what is causing the problem. regards, Martin. posted: 22 Apr 2011 15:44 from: Antrox Hi Martin! Thanks a lot for your help. Clicking on the menu option you said Templot zooms to the 0,0 coordinate point and nothing is shown. The version of Templot I'm using is 0,91.c and the dxf file is composed about 15 straight lines in mm so I think the dxf file is very simple. Anyway dxf is attached. regards, Antonio. Attachment: attach_1041_1462_Dibujo1.dxf 188 posted: 22 Apr 2011 16:32 from: Martin Wynne Hi Antonio, Thanks for attaching your DXF file. I'm a bit puzzled. I imported it into Templot 091c and it appeared to be fine. This is what I'm seeing ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  31k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1462.php
... . posted: 24 Oct 2014 18:17 from: Martin Wynne Jim Guthrie wrote: If you are adding pre-sets, I would quite like FS160 added. Hi Jim, Sure. Are these dimensions ok? 2_241315_340000000.png regards, Martin. posted: 25 Oct 2014 06:48 from: Hayfield Martin Whilst we are talking pre-set gauges, how about please a couple no narrow gauge pre-set ones for the dummies like myself who struggle to add my own pre-set gauges. 00-9 and 0-16.5 would be really helpfull. Thanks John posted: 25 Oct 2014 08:23 from: Jim Guthrie Martin Wynne wrote: Jim Guthrie wrote: If you are adding pre-sets, I would quite like FS160 added. Hi Jim, Sure. Are these dimensions ok? Martin, These look fine. Many thanks- it saves making custom standards. Jim. posted: 25 Oct 2014 10:46 from: Martin Wynne Jim Guthrie wrote: These look fine. Many thanks- it saves making custom standards ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  29k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_2558.php
... 7mm gauges reduced from 32mm work? Thanks in advance for any enlightenment. Phil Last edited on 23 Feb 2014 10:03 by Phil O posted: 23 Feb 2014 09:22 from: Martin Wynne Phil O wrote: Can anyone please help with track standards for Irish 3 foot gauge using 7mm scale, 21 mm track gauge and Slaters wheels. Will using one of the already extant 7mm gauges reduced from 32mm work? Hi Phil, The answer is yes. For sharp narrow-gauge curves I would suggest starting from 0-MF 31.5mm rather than 0-SF 31.2mm. So that means reducing everything by the difference (31.5- 21)= 10.5mm reduction. So back-to-back for Slaters wheels is 29.2- 10.5= 18.7mm. For other wheels 29.0- 10.5= 18.5mm. Track gauge 21mm. Flangeways 1.5mm as 0-MF. Check gauge (30- 10.5)= 19.5mm. The alternative would be to use S7 wheels and the corresponding reduction. The ScaleSeven Group may already have members modelling 3ft gauge and recommended standards ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  20k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_2412.php
... (these will be model sizes, not prototype). Save the DXF file. 8. Open the DXF file in a text editor such as Windows Notepad (DXF files are plain text). 9. Search for the word "ENTITIES" and delete everything above it in the file. 10. You should now have a long list looking like this short extract for each timber. Search for the word "LINE" to mark the start of each block of data:......... 0 LINE -- -- -- start of data for this timber 8 TIMBCENT 10 171.96 -- -- -- X dimension to this timber centre 20 65.10 11 171.96 21 11.10 0 TEXT 8 TIMBNUMB 10 169.96 20 6.63 40 2.47 1 1.T6 -- -- -- template number, and this timber number 0 LINE -- -- -- end of data for this timber, start of next timber. 8......... With some creative searching and replacing it should be ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  21k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1438.php
... wire diameter in swg -- "standard wire gauge". We use it that way in modelling too, for example "EM gauge" simply means "EM size" and implies both a scale and a track gauge (and in fact covers two different track gauges, 18.0mm and 18.2mm). Strictly speaking, if we want to refer specifically to the distance between the rails it should be two words "track gauge". However, the web forums are full of arguments about this, and whether it should be "0 Scale" in the American style or "0 Gauge" in the UK, so whatever we do in Templot is sure not to please someone. The gauge settings were previously in the template> gauge and scale> menu item (091c), or the control> gauge and scale> menu item (074b), which seemed clear and unambiguous. But I regularly receive enquiries from first time users saying "where do I set it to 0 gauge?" or similar, so I felt that moving the short list ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  21k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1548.php
... grid/data in imperial measurements. The grid itself on the sketchboard is in 1' squares. I now realise that the blue numbers on the left are from the box file grid which is behind the sketchboard. If mm are down the right hand side and bottom in blue, it is possible the top and left hand edge in yellow are in inches as 18'= 216". It's very confusing, particularly as it appears the track layout starts around 40" from the left. If that were correct surely the 0" datum should be in line with the 0" on the blue grid... Strange. posted: 2 Dec 2011 06:06 from: Martin Wynne Hi Gordon, The real problem here is that I haven't yet written the help notes for the sketchboard. That's the downside of working with a development version. First of all, the blue numbers on the extreme left in your first screenshot are the underlying grid labels on the workpad, they are not part of the sketchboard window. You may find it helpful ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  23k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1711.php
127. platforms
... turnout are not very common. I may add that or I may not -- it could get messy. The intention at present is that the turnout-side platforms are for the approach or exit plain track sections of the template, if any. But provided the turnout is not on a transition curve or slewed, you can do this: In Normal mode: 1. copy the turnout to the control template (don't delete it). 2. put the peg at CTRL-1 (or anywhere except CTRL-0). 3. click do> approach/plain track> snap approach to EGTP menu item. (External Geometrical Tangent Position) 4. click tools> make split> make plain track turnout road> on external geometrical radius menu item. 5. click geometry> track centre-lines only menu item. 6. click real> platforms... menu item to add the platform as required. 7. store& background. If the turnout is on a transition or slewed, you can overlay a bit of ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  64k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1488.php
... topic: 2028 Three throw point posted: 24 Jul 2012 10:20 from: mike47j I'm building a three throw point in 0 guage. Anyone have any tips on how to do this. Especially how to move the inner blades? Normally, I would use a thin strip if fiberglass pcb and lace pins as hinges soldered to the inner face of the rail, but there is no space to do that on the inner blades of a three throw. Mike Johnson posted: 24 Jul 2012 13:16 from: Martin Wynne Hi Mike, Richard Lambert of this parish (" dikitriki" on RMweb) wrote a detailed topic on the construction of a 3-throw in 0 gauge. Unfortunately, it was on Old RMweb which is off-line at present. It's possible he also posted it elsewhere, such as the Guild forum, so it might be worth a PM to him. If you can wait a week or two, RMweb is getting new servers in the next couple of weeks, and if all goes to plan Andy ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  24k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_2028.php
... topic: 1397 RAID PC Help posted: 2 Mar 2011 17:11 from: Ian Allen Hi everyone, Don't know if we have any really good IT people on here, but my RAID 0 arrayed PC seems to have lost Windows Vista. Now, a friend of mine has interrogated the drives and it seems there is a problem with the Master Boot Record partition. We have attempted a /FixMbr using the Vista OS disc, but this hasn't resolved the problem. /ScanOs still shows no Windows applications on the drives. Both drives are healthy and have no faults. At the moment my only course of action is to a data recovery company and have had quotes around the £900+ VAT mark, which I currently cannot afford unfortunately. Has anyone any experience with RAID PC's or any ideas of what I could try to fix the problem? Ian posted: 2 Mar 2011 18:30 from: mike47j Do you actually use raid 0? One big fast disk made from two small slower disks, but with double the risk of ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  19k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1397.php
... force, most of the dimension labels are shown in red: 2_151224_280000000.png (In this mode the sketchboard could be used to create simple leaflets, greetings cards, etc., should anyone choose to use Templot for such work.) When there is a trackplan item on the sketchboard, dimensioning is transferred to the blue rulers on the bottom and right, which are scaled to match the grid dimensions on the workpad and not the printed paper dimensions. It is not necessary for the trackplan item to occupy the full page, the 0,0 origin on the blue rulers will set itself to the bottom left corner of the trackplan, as for the grid origin on the workpad. Items on the page are then dimensioned to their bottom left corner, as on the workpad, and as an indication that this mode is in force, most of the dimension labels are shown in blue: 2_151224_290000002.png 2_151224_280000001.png I'm hoping this won't be too confusing. Note that in the red mode, Y dimensions are measured positive downwards from the top. In the blue mode, ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  284k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_1126.php
... main road: 2_150926_220000000.png To reduce the bump you need to use a shorter switch. I did suggest using a 9ft straight switch. The shortest available switch is the 1:24 model-only switch as above, which would reduce the bump to almost nothing. To eliminate it entirely you would need to change to gaunt turnouts, with the gaunt offset set to zero. Unfortunately there is no way to make these changes globally, you would need to change each turnout individually -- put the peg somewhere other than CTRL-0 first. Or I can write some code to do it globally? Which is what I would do for my own projects. It might take me a day or two before I can get it released. I'm trying to fix Jim's diamond-crossing conundrum at the same time. Anything is possible in Templot, but I don't always release it because the task of creating a user interface is just too much work, and writing the instructions beyond me. cheers, Martin. posted: 15 May 2020 14:45 from ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  508k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3667.php
... topic: 3545 metafiles! posted: 6 Nov 2019 00:07 from: Martin Wynne I have been very feeble-brained. Just because everyone tells you a thing can't be done, it doesn't mean it can't be done. Just to see what happened I wrote (in Lazarus): var met_rect:TRect; met_handle:HWND; begin met_rect:=Rect(0 ,0 ,800,600); met_handle:=CreateEnhMetaFile(0 ,nil,@met_rect,nil); It compiled and returned a valid metafile handle! That means I'm well on the way to replicating the Delphi TMetafile functions. Wish me luck. Martin. posted: 6 Nov 2019 00:19 from: Rob Manchester Good luck Martin Rob posted: 6 Nov 2019 00:50 from: Martin Wynne Thanks Rob. Seriously it is only a start. And it is Windows only. But if I could get it going it would put a much brighter outlook on moving everything to T3 a lot sooner. cheers, Martin. posted: 6 Nov ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  26k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3545.php
... it looks like part of a database or spreadsheet file. How it came to be incorporated in your .box file is a mystery. So in case anyone here recognises this, here it is converted to plain text:...Bewdley South ÔX...Bewdley North 2002 t...Kidderminster 20...Arley mi...Hampton Loade 20...Bridgnorth d...[ ...ley...Exeter.: C...È...È...Exeter West 1970 2 t...Rotherwas Jcn 70...Resolven East 70...Radyr Jcn 1961 0...Radyr Jcn 1984 0...Radyr Jcn 1987 0...Bewdley North 1956 t...Par Station...Exeter Central 'B' t..........iddle Middle Line'.... Mid.... Mid...DP Exeter Middle Relief Line '...UR Exeter Middle Relief Line'.... R.... R...DM Exeter Middle Main Line...UM Exeter Middle Main Line.... M... M City Basin Main Line.. ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  37k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_509.php
... topic: 3321 0 Gauge starter layout posted: 25 Aug 2018 14:54 from: Richard_Jones As I alluded to in a post on Singleton, the impulse purchase of a Dapol O gauge terrier in KESR blue livery has led to the development of a small layout, so that I can "play trains", as that day will be some time off for Singleton. So, imagine the KESR had built the line from Northiam to Rye and included a triangular junction (as mooted for the Cranbrook extension), then my "mini-layout" enviages a platform just to the East of Northiam, where one leg of the triangle meets the KESR, which avoids two lines across the road at the station. The other leg of the triangle, which provides for through running from Tenterden to Rye, is "off stage left" and has would have similar extensive facilities (!) to the West junction. For signalling purposes, "Rother Platform (West) for Rye" is within the station confines of Northiam, so that the home ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  18k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3321.php
... I would be enthusiastic about dealing with CL at all. I wish both parties well. posted: 6 Aug 2018 17:36 from: Martin Wynne DerekStuart wrote: given that the majority have previously opted for Exactoscale over CL components, I'm not sure where that leaves CL. Hi Derek, Andrew Jukes has made clear that he is interested only in EM and P4, and won't be having anything to do with 00. That leaves C&L with the entire 00 market, and the copper-clad market, and 0 gauge. All of which is an order of magnitude larger than EM/P4. Or at least it used to be, no doubt the arrival of the new Peco 00 bullhead range has changed things a bit. The addition of the Exactoscale range to C&L was a fairly recent development (since Brian Lewis's time), so its removal still leaves C&L where they were before. The big difference from Brian Lewis's time is that in those days the web site worked, and delivery was same-day ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  182k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3271.php
... came up with a small terminal for a 2 car unit or a pull-push 2 carriage+ engine and some goods sidings. It just didn't gel in my head though. Natalie (my friend whom I go to shows with and plan these things with) suggested looking at the Harton Electric system. Wanting to keep things as simple as possible and within the 6ftx1ft6" space (+ 2-3ft storage), the High Staithes part was selected as being simple and workable. Stock will mainly be 4 wheel hopper wagons and 0-4 -0 electric locos. Possibly 0-6 -0DH and Bo-Bo electric locos could turn up. Attachment: attach_2657_3242_Harton_High_Stait hes_- _P4.box 199 posted: 21 Mar 2018 12:29 from: Martin Wynne Hi Kelly, You have a bit of leftover tandem: 2_210728_560000000.png Martin. posted: 21 Mar 2018 14:32 from: d827kelly So I do Martin. Oops. I originally started with a pair of tandems to try to replicate the earlier formation when there were two staithes. It wouldn't ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  15k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3242.php
... a good shot of the chairs, but somebody parked his big engine on the spot. Hi Andy, There is good evidence that photographers, when taking a photograph of railway track, invariably wait until there is a locomotive in the way. Martin. posted: 28 Feb 2018 05:12 from: Martin Wynne Hi Rob, First try. I put a+ 3 dioptre close-up lens on the camera, set f/16, left everything else on Auto, attached an air-tube release, plonked an 0 Gauge wagon in front of it, and this is the result: 1. Full frame reduced to 20%: wagon_close_up2.jpg 2. Actual size dot-for-dot cropped from the (JPG) image. This is an area about 10mm x 8mm on the model, i.e. about 100 dots per mm. wagon_close_up1.jpg I'm well pleased with that, bearing in mind how little effort was needed to set it up. EXIF data says: F/16 1.2 seconds ISO 800 I'm sure with a bit of tweaking and ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  1,335k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3228.php
... the measurement entry option where you are asked to enter the co-ordinates for two opposite corners. For your "L" shaped baseboard you might want to draw the longer leg horizontal and the shorter leg vertical. Also the basic measurements in Templot are metric (I know there is a way of entering Imperial but I can't remember at the moment) so converting your longer leg of 12' x 2' to metric gives a metric size of 3658mm x 610mm. So your first point for the rectangle would have X= 0 and Y= 0 and the second point at the opposite end would have X= 3658 and Y= 610. For your second rectangle of the shorter leg, the length would be 2438mm x 610 and the points of insertion for this rectangle would have the following values- X= 3658, Y= 0 for the first and X= 4268, Y= 2438 for the second. If you want to depict smaller sized boards, you can sub-divide the larger dimensions to draw smaller rectangles. I find that ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  21k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3209.php
... "slide value". Not what I expected. edited to make more sense- it's a been a long day Last edited on 12 Jun 2009 20:10 by richard_t posted: 12 Jun 2009 22:12 from: Martin Wynne richard_t wrote: edited to make more sense- it's a been a long day Hi Richard, If that's making more sense, what was it like before! Seriously, it's all working as intended. If entering the peg dimension directly it needs to be negative on X relative to CTRL-0 on the second turnout, and then you can peg the second turnout over the the first turnout using the notch. Leave the peg Y dimension unchanged on half-gauge for the main-road centre-line. I'll make a bit of Jing video shortly showing that. It's probably easier to zoom right in so that you get more mouse resolution, and then set the required slide offset using the mouse action directly. These peg dimensions are internal to the template and therefore independent of any curving, i.e. peg X ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  22k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_867.php
... posted: 31 Aug 2018 00:13 from: Jim Guthrie Martin Wynne wrote: The automated tandems were tricky to do, and there are still some loose ends which could do with further work. But it was a piece of cake compared to the much bigger problem, and I simply have no idea how to do that -- how to make sure that everyone knows it's there? Martin, I've just tried the Make Tandem function and it works very well. But just one question. I did a test run in 0-MF using a B6 as the second turnout on a single sided tandem and Templot generated the first turnout with a 1:32 tandem switch and a 5.73 curviform crossing. The information panel showed a minimum radius of 81.1" and it looked, as you would expect, a lot tighter than the B6 second turnout with a regular crossing and a minimum radius of 73". I generated another template with a B switch and a curviform 1:5.73 crossing and that had a minimum radius of 74.7". I placed ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 22  -  63k  -  URL: https://85a.uk/templot/archive/topics/topic_3170.php
Result Pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next >>


Search took 0.199 seconds


Back to Templot Club