Templot Club Archive - Search Results
To search again, click the Back button in your browser.
Search results for: defunct
5 results found.
... sorry it has taken so long and you are still waiting. Templot coding development is very slow nowadays because so much of my Templot time is taken up with user support. I have over a dozen emails waiting for replies at the moment -- problems downloading, CDs lost in the post, retrieving backups, questions about the difference between Templot and XTrkCad, lost release codes,... And by the time I have finished dealing with them there will be several more arrived. You uploaded your .box file to the now defunct templot.info site, so I'm attaching it again below for those who haven't seen it. Also here is a screenshot. It sure will be impressive! john_watt.png regards, Martin. Attachment: attach_181_298_john_watt_princes_r isborough.box 290 posted: 2 Jan 2008 15:28 from: John Watt Hi Martin. I know it's the irregular diamonds I'm going to need, I'm using 0.82d as it works for me and I didn't need any of the new features in 0.9x. I'm surprised it's two years since I posted the plan but it's taken me that ...
... have existed. The move to ARM chips was inevitable when the iOS devices started becoming so popular. To Apple, it makes sense to control the CPU design, something impossible with Intel (only Intel and AMD are allowed to manufacturer x86 compatible chips, and then AMD only due to the original IBM PC design calling for two chip manufacturers for IBM to proceed with the deal, Intel is very hesitant to let others make x86 chips. The only others in the past being Cyrix and later NEC/VIA, which is effectively defunct now). Intel's continued problems moving beyond 14nm production is another major reason for this move from Apple. They can design and tailor the Axx chips for each device type as they please now, probably giving more cache and cores to iMacs/MacBooks etc and the MacBook Air if it continues will probably in effect use a faster version of the Axx chip in whatever iPad is current. They could have gone for AMD x86 chips (they already use AMD for graphics chips), but it probably felt the right time to ...
... just doesn't cut it. Is there a source of the relevant dimensions? posted: 22 Aug 2012 09:43 from: Paul Boyd Ian Bunch wrote: Good call Paul. I would like to know the dimensions you use in S4n2. I wish to have some 1'11.5" feeder lines on my P4 layout and 009 just doesn't cut it. Is there a source of the relevant dimensions? Hi Ian The information is not readily available online, as far as I know. I work to the standards suggested by the apparently defunct Narrow Gauge Study Group of the Scalefour Society, who used to publish a magazine now and then. It was actually headed by the late Lynden Emery, although he handed the reigns over to Paul Holmes (Borth-y -Gest) some years ago when he felt no longer able to continue. For 2ft gauge, the gauge used is 7.83mm to represent 1ft 11 in. Track and wheel standards are based on those of the 2mm Scale Association, and below are the standards used by the few of us that model ...
4. Amazed Newby
... Templot. I'm also stunned (gobsmacked?) by the capabilities of Templot. I realize that it is not designed as a general track planning tool, yet it serves that function as well as any I have seen and better than most. We have all seen elegant prototype track scenes where a lot of what we in the US would call 'special trackwork' is employed make the tracks, yards, sidings (loops?) flow organically into the geology of the site. I have one site in mind from up near the defunct Pennsylvania RR 'town' of Renovo, PA. My hunting camp is nearby and every time I go there I have to go up an old pipeline service road to a hilltop where I can see this trackage. However, it's full of curved track switches and crossing diamonds, one of which contains two different curves. I think that Templot is the only way I could possibly layout a version of this prototype trackage. My thanks for this wonderful tool. I'll look forward eagerly to working with the 9mm-type modelers in ...
... one was a transition curve itself.. What have I misunderstood? A recent topic in Prototype Pictures showed some pictures and fuzzy track plans of the south end of Shrewsbury Station prior to the first stage of serious renovation. I've always had a fondness for my home town station and surrounding marshalling yards etc. as my Grandfather, based in Shrewsbury, was a well respected guard on goods trains and often took me to visit his colleagues there in the late 50's/ early 60's and have dim recollections of trains coming to the now defunct platforms 1&2. So just for the exercise, in idle moments I've been trying to use Templot to reproduce the early trackplan in N (UK) scale. posted: 2 May 2015 23:20 from: Martin Wynne dave turner wrote: Whilst trying to create a transition curve between two apparently non-intersecting templates I got an error message suggesting I try another B6 turnout amongst other possibilities. Neither of the templates included a turnout, though one was a transition curve itself. Hi Dave, If one of ...
Search took 0.096 seconds
Back to Templot Club