Templot Club Archive - Search Results
To search again, click the Back button in your browser.
Search results for: penalties
12 results found.
... the web links have been half etched away and some ballast sprinkled over. The tabs from sleeper to border have also been half cut, so that the border will snap off easily. The material is .8mm (nominal) ply. P3280827.jpg Best regards Mike posted: 29 Mar 2009 19:02 from: Brian Lewis Just a thought Mike. All timber and timber products imported into the EU must comply with the requirements of the International Standards for Phytosanitory Measures 15 (ISPM 15). There are no exceptions to this and the penalties for ignoring this- both for the consignor and the consignee are severe. Now folk handling timber should be well aware of this, as Australia has probably the strictest rules- your Government's AQIS 19 notice is probably implanted in the hearts of all exporters to Oz. You should be able to find locally, a certification company who will be able to certify that wood products complied with ISPM 15 when they left your premises and will issue a certificate to that effect. With this there will be no problems with it clearing by ...
... is balanced against the problems and costs that arise if/when any form of Wrong Direction movement with a train Carrying Passengers needs to be made if the points that become Facing do not have installed locking. Essentially- all non-locked points have to be Clipped, Scotched and flagged before a Passenger Carrying, Wrong Direction movement can be made- this includes dragging a failed train back. With the massive reduction in manpower this has become nearly impossible- or, at best, involves a massive delay- and delays now incur penalties. Because penalties are cumulative a single delay can easily be far greater than the cost of providing locking. For the really modern scene there is also a strong trend to make all Passenger Carrying lines Bi-Directional. This Bi-Di facility can be complete or as an reduced provision. In either case it means that all connections become potentially Facing for Passenger Carrying movements- and therefore all the points get to be fitted and interlocked with FPL arrangements. In addition- the development of larger and faster freight trains from the ...
... 17 Aug 2017 20:02 from: Andrew Barrowman Thanks for the ideas Martin and Phil. I should be able to strengthen the inside half of the check rail jaws as they are fairly well hidden. With that and minimizing the flair might be sufficient. Breaking out the vee section is a good idea. My only concern is that it adds some tolerance in the position of the vee relative to the rest of the frog, but maybe it's manageable. One of the nice things about printing is there isn't much of a penalty for proliferating a lot of different versions. I'm thinking I might end up with a version that has all metal rails and a live frog and another version that has printed checks and wings with a dead frog. These days with DCC and keep alive caps stalling on dead frogs isn't a problem, and some people really can't be bothered with the extra effort associated with frog polarity switching. It takes all kinds.... posted: 17 Aug 2017 23:57 from: Andrew Barrowman Martin, What would be a ...
... should have to, and in practice it's pointless because within a week or two they start doing it again. I was actually referring to the different situation where a customer has signed up with an email verification service. When you try to send the customer an email, you get one back from the verification service saying that it will not be delivered until you visit the service's web site and prove who you are, why you are writing to the customer, and agree to be bound by various conditions on pain of severe financial penalties. The one I had the other day required me to agree to pay them $20,000 if I ever send the customer an email which they regard as spam. If I didn't click the box to agree, my original email wouldn't be delivered. regards, Martin. posted: 5 Mar 2008 17:27 from: Alan Turner Hi, my understanding is that the recipient can pre-authorise your e-mail. Perhaps it should be a term of your dealing that they do so. Alan posted: 5 ...
... , 30", or something much more P4-like? Should I stick to 00-BF where presumably I could go down to 30" comfortably. 3. What method of track construction to employ? I'm not asking what is best (ply and rivet, pcb, or ply and chair. Any others....?) but essentially which is quickest? I suspect ply and rivet is slower than the others, and clearly chair and ply looks better than pcb, but is there a time and financial penalty? 4. Just a quicky about Templot: I think I understand "copy to current", but what is the difference in use between "wipe to current" and "delete to current". Presumably delete to current deletes the template from the storage box, and you won't have a copy there of what the template was like before you modified it. But what does "wipe" do? Thanks in anticipation, Robert Preston posted: 22 Jan 2010 19:10 from: Paul Boyd Hi Robert 1. ...
... will meet my requirements before I buy. Which I did, and I have. quote from the legislation:( my bold underline) c)for the supply of goods made to the consumer's specifications or clearly personalised or which by reason of their nature cannot be returned or are liable to deteriorate or expire rapidly;. It is convenient for purchasers to have a choice of payment method, but I also take the view that it is up to a vendor to determine what forms of payment are acceptable to do business. The penalty a vendor may have to accept is that any limitation of method of payment may result in lost sales. Given the statistics of your time in business, the potential loss is acceptably small, especially when the extra hassle of postal ordering is taken into account. This seems to be a bit of a storm in a tea-cup, or is someone trying it on? Best wishes, long may you continue with distributing Templot. Les G posted: 15 Jun 2011 03:45 from: Martin Wynne Thanks to all ...
... dedicate much more time to Templot, which is clearly necessary, so you can expect many more posts from me. Best regards Charles Attachment: attach_1585_2196_Slip_Try2.box 308 posted: 14 Apr 2013 11:09 from: Martin Wynne Hi Charles, It looks fine to me. What do you think is wrong? You have the usual problem in 00 of the slip road conflicting with the K-crossing check rail, which will need to be shortened accordingly -- real> adjust check rails menu item. That is just one of the penalties of using 00 gauge. There is some discussion about this, and ways of easing the problem here: topic 324 regards, Martin. posted: 14 Apr 2013 12:05 from: Charles Orr Thanks again Martin. I've selected moveable K crossings and as you indicated in the reference, this has got rid of the check rail problem. I intend to use to use servo motors to drive the slip. Where would you suggest attaching the tie bars to operate the K crossings? One last question. How would I ...
... gravity moves forward as Mr Barrowman would be well aware of. Cars are a slightly different animal. Yes centre of gravity is still important, so distribution of weight is critical for certain performance requirements. That is why front mid-engined and rear mid-engined cars tend to dominate the cutting edge of sports car racing and high performance cars. In the old days it was transaxle gearboxes to get the beat weight distribution. Outside of Rally cars four wheel drive not so much. Though efficient there are weight and mechanical friction penalties. With four wheel drive It is not an issue of weight so much as options. You have more mechanical options. When one wheel loses grip three more are still working and when one axle set loses grip the other one can bail you out of trouble depending on how complex the differential/stability control system is. With four wheel drive off-road it also comes down to axle articulation in the really rough stuff. In fact suspension design is as important as good tyres as it helps keep the maximum amount of ...
... educational purposes. If you don't like the costs you don't use them. But as dubious as it is, as I have mentioned, contract law applies and it will cost you money to defend. If you have talked to the owner of the item that you consequently have used without payment it could be said you have entered a verbal contract. And you will find the popular misquote of Samuel Goldwyn "A verbal contract isn't worth the paper it's written on" not quite true. There is no fixed upper limit of a penalty with a verbal contract... And you would be required to prove you sourced the item elsewhere. With regards to photographs, I believe you are correct that a photo taken in a public place is yours and yours alone regardless of what it captures. However you may find yourself up against local laws regarding privacy, especially in regards to images of children. Also in this current climate those people in private or public organisations tend to be a little over zealous in regards people taking photos... even if, ...
... was the worst bug in 19 years of Templot. It has shaken me up to discover I released a version of Templot with such a bug in it. I can't understand how I could have made such a silly mistake, and then failed to find it when testing. As others have said, no need to beat yourself up- to err is human- and you are amongst sympathetic friends! It seems to me that the rate of development of Templot is also as high as it has ever been, and if the penalty for that is an occasional slip, then for me at least, that is fine. The automatic update process means up-versioning is no problem (at least for those of us who have already got shut of AVG!) so the fixes cause no hassle at all. Ultimately, when we use "free" software, we accept that we are all Beta Testers! Why not have a day off and come back refreshed- I have just put a small donation in the pot so you can buy yourself a ...
... . This Regulation does not apply to the processing of personal data: (a) in the course of an activity which falls outside the scope of Union law; (b) by the Member States when carrying out activities which fall within the scope of Chapter 2 of Title V of the TEU (c) by a natural person in the course of a purely personal or household activity; (d) by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security. There have been" misguided" suggestion that it doesnt apply to people not engaged in" economic activity" because they fall out of the definition of an" enterprise" There is no such exception( equally there is no mention of the word" companies", the term used is enterprise. However you could argue under two grounds (a) you are engaged in a personal activity. i.e. its for your interest and entertainment (b) ...
... the company (including projects for internal use) is a violation of the Embarcadero Community Edition Software usage and the company (i.e. your employer) is liable for such infringement. Embarcadero wants to remind you that the use of the Community Edition Software outside the scope of the EULA is a form of piracy and is illegal. Embarcadero takes the protection of its copyright very seriously and has a compliance and legal team constantly monitoring to ensure its intellectual property rights are not infringed. Upon detection of an unauthorized use, additional fees and penalties will be applied in order to mitigate the copyright infringement. Should you wish to contact Embarcadero to purchase a commercial version of the software, please contact compliance@embarcadero.com. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at compliance@embarcadero.com Thank you! David Sanchez Global Manager of License Compliance 10801-1 N. Mopac Expressway, Suite 100| Austin, TX 78759 compliance@embarcadero.com posted: 10 Mar 2020 19:11 from: DerekStuart Hello Martin If that is as a result of you ...
Search took 0.129 seconds
Back to Templot Club