|
|||
author | remove search highlighting | ||
---|---|---|---|
posted: 18 Jul 2012 20:48 from: acoake
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hello I wonder if anyone can help me to design curved double junctions using the new half-diamond facility? I'm still learning Templot and while getting most things sorted out (with much trial and error), I'm not getting good results on my first curved double junction. I've included the current box file to show how I've attempted it so far and the results (not inspiring). Not being a PW expert, I'm not sure of the correct way to go about it and this may be adding to my problems. Any help would be much appreciated. By the way, the overlapping circles at the top are not a mistake - they are my attempt to represent a helix, which I am using to transfer from level to level. Many thanks in anticipation Allen Oakes |
||
Attachment: attach_1472_2025_helixtop_2012_07_18_2022_16.box 490 | |||
posted: 18 Jul 2012 21:29 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Allen, Before discussing double junctions -- are you sure your 46mm track centres spacing is sufficient clearance for your rolling stock at these radii? I just did a quick check on your plan using the default vehicle sizes in the dummy vehicle tool, and it's looking too close for comfort: 2_181616_140000000.png The usual spacing for 4mm scale at these radii would be 50mm centres. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 18 Jul 2012 22:58 from: acoake
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Martin, Many thanks for your very quick response. I used 46mm because I think I picked it up fom one of the many books I have read on building model tracks. However, I believe that I can increase it should it be necessary. I was going to use the tools you provide, but only after I had got something approaching a reasonable plan. Allen Oakes |
||
posted: 21 Jul 2012 23:18 from: acoake
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi again Martin, Have now located where I found 46mm from - it is in the Trax2 design software book (in fact it quotes 45mm, so I am wrong even to that!). However, I am increasing to 50mm as you suggest. On the curved double junctions, I have just discovered the option to "Make Diamond Crossing", which I had completely overlooked. Before you or any other kind soul in this club spend time trying to answer my request, I feel that I should examine this option in much more detail. Thanks again Allen Oakes |
||
posted: 21 Jul 2012 23:30 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
acoake wrote:I have just discovered the option to "Make Diamond Crossing", which I had completely overlooked.Hi Allen, There are two such functions, which work differently. Try both of them: 1. tools > make diamond-crossing menu item. 2. for a background template, peg/align tools > make diamond-crossing at intersection menu item. As your junction is on a transition curve, it will need some extra adjustments. I'm planning to make you a bit of video showing that. See also tools > make ladder crossover menu item. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 22 Jul 2012 09:36 from: acoake
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin, I've read elsewhere on this forum that seem never to sleep. Many thanks for the responses and the additional information. I look forward to the video, whenever you can manage to produce it. Warm regards Allen Oakes |
||
posted: 10 Jul 2016 18:07 from: Gavin Rose click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Just a quicky. Amaxingly I have been able to make curved double junctions, the tutorials helped here. I've had a few goes at it trying to perfect things and so far I have managed to create the double each end, the issue I am having is being able to create a perfect mirror so they can join up with non wonky straights in between. Is there a way to select all the track you want, copy it, mirror it then paste it in? I have managed to select track before but it goes red and there seems to be no option for what I am looking for. Any advice would be appreciated. Transition curves are also something I haven't figured yet, I can select them and the track changes its form but that is about it. |
||
posted: 10 Jul 2016 18:23 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Gavin Rose wrote:Is there a way to select all the track you want, copy it, mirror it then paste it in? I have managed to select track before but it goes red and there seems to be no option for what I am looking for.Hi Gavin, Select all the templates you want as a group. Then click the group > create duplicate group menu item. Then you will probably want to use the SHIFT+CTRL+F7 mouse action (or just press the BACKSLASH key) to move them into clear space where you can see what you are doing with them. Then to mirror it, click the group > mirror group on X at notch menu item (or Y, as required)*. If you don't position the notch first, you will probably need to zoom out to see it. Then to join a group of templates onto other templates, you need to use the notch linking functions. More about that here: http://templot.com/martweb/gs_geometry.htm#shift_group_notch *X mirrors about a vertical line through the notch; Y mirrors about a horizontal line through the notch. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 10 Jul 2016 18:44 from: Gavin Rose click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Martin. I figured out how to use the G / Group function just before I read your reply but I was having a right pig of a job trying to then move them out of the super imposed position. Didn't know about the Shift+Control+F7. Worked a treat. Many thanks. |
||
posted: 14 Jan 2017 22:36 from: Chris Mitton click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin Wynne wrote: acoake wrote:Hi MartinI have just discovered the option to "Make Diamond Crossing", which I had completely overlooked.Hi Allen, I'm attempting to construct an irregular diamond where two plain lines intersect - one is pretty straight, the other on a curve. Following your advice as above, I made the straight line the control, selected the curved line and clicked as you suggest, i.e. "make diamond crossing at intersection". This put the notch at the intersection of the two centre-lines, as I hoped it would, but thereafter very little seems to have happened. Where do I go from there - to create all the necessary wing rails and check rails correctly positioned for the V- and K-crossings? I can think of a fiddly way of doing it by creating squillions of small partial templates, but is there an elegant way of doing it? Regards Chris Mitton |
||
posted: 14 Jan 2017 22:53 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Chris Mitton wrote:This put the notch at the intersection of the two centre-lines, as I hoped it would, but thereafter very little seems to have happened.Hi Chris, So what happened when you clicked the green bar? 2_141750_530000000.png You should then have seen something like this: 2_141751_310000000.png Now you need to split the underlying template and adjust it to the boundaries (in the next program update coming soon, there will be some additional functions to help with that). regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 14 Jan 2017 23:21 from: Chris Mitton click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin Wynne wrote: Chris Mitton wrote:That's pretty much what I was hoping would happen - but when I clicked the green bar, nothing appeared.....This put the notch at the intersection of the two centre-lines, as I hoped it would, but thereafter very little seems to have happened.Hi Chris, I think I'll have another go in the morning - but thanks as ever for your very prompt reply. Regards Chris |
||
posted: 14 Jan 2017 23:55 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Chris Mitton wrote:That's pretty much what I was hoping would happen - but when I clicked the green bar, nothing appeared.....Hi Chris, It's always possible that you have found a bug. Please could you post your .box file here? Thanks. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 15 Jan 2017 13:52 from: Chris Mitton click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin Wynne wrote: Chris Mitton wrote:Hi MartinThat's pretty much what I was hoping would happen - but when I clicked the green bar, nothing appeared.....Hi Chris, It's far more likely that I'm trying to do something a bit weird - this morning I created two random intersecting tracks (one straight, one curved), selected the appropriate make diamond crossing tool, and it worked a treat, with all the check and wing rails apparently in the right places. What I'm trying to draw is a variation on the GER's infamous, and bizarre, construction at Braintree, but the opposite hand - it's a turnout into a passing loop, but left-handed instead of right-handed as at Braintree, with another turnout on the left (into a goods yard), so it's essentially a tandem with the two turnouts both on the left but in the "wrong" order, therefore the second exit road re-crosses the first one. I think the point of the arrangement is that the yard entry is now trailing not facing, so it saves an FPL. I suspect the reason the "make diamond" tool doesn't work is that the diamond is incomplete, there are two K-crossings but only one V. The attached .box should show you what I mean - I've drawn it with all sleepers omitted for clarity. I did once manage to create the V-crossing more or less to my satisfaction, by using various rails from two different half-diamonds, so I guess I'll have to plough on that way, fiddly as it is. Alternatively I could just draw them all in by hand, or even just build the bloody thing using gauges and bits of rail that look about the right length.... Regards Chris |
||
Attachment: attach_2376_2025_Fen2_2017_01_14_2240_33.box 296 | |||
posted: 15 Jan 2017 14:28 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Chris, Is this what you mean? 2399_170555_330000000.jpg I notice that your tandem is a type 1, whereas the photo clearly shows a type 2 tandem (second switch is in turnout road of first switch). You can probably create the far half-diamond using make diamond-crossing at intersection, but for the near one you will need to shorten it to little more than the K-crossings. You may find that adjusting the V-crossing angle on that (F9 mouse action), and possibly changing the hand, may help. Or not. It's such a strange formation that I suspect the only way will be to build it up with partial templates. I will maybe have a dabble at it later. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 15 Jan 2017 17:18 from: rodney_hills
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hello, Am I right in assuming that the prototype formation pictured is a way to avoid having a facing point, plus FPL etc, for that siding on the left? Regards, Rodney Hills |
||
posted: 15 Jan 2017 17:49 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
rodney_hills wrote:Am I right in assuming that the prototype formation pictured is a way to avoid having a facing point, plus FPL etc, for that siding on the left?Hi Rodney, That is the usual reason given. It also allows the siding to depart at a much sharper angle than would be the case for a single turnout. Most likely it is necessary to be a trailing connection for the signal interlocking. It is a common arrangement for a yard to be accessed via a trailing connection over a diamond-crossing. Here for example is Rubery on the Halesowen Railway: RuberyStnfromDownHome.jpg © D J Norton. Image linked from this excellent site: http://www.photobydjnorton.com regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 16 Jan 2017 16:46 from: Chris Mitton click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin Wynne wrote: Hi Chris,Hi Martin Many thanks - that is indeed the prototype I was attempting to make even more bizarre As far as the signalling is concerned, I think mine is still a Type 1 tandem (does it matter?) - the left road of the first turnout is still the main, because that's the way arriving (ie facing) trains will go - but it's curved round until the turnout road is virtually straight, then reverse-curved to become the passing loop. I guess this will put the switch-blade set in the wrong road - but then the whole thing would need a 10mph restriction anyway to avoid breaking the signalman's arm surrendering the token! So partial templates it is - but I seem to recall, designing another GER special a few years ago, using several partial templates of which at least one was shrunk to a single rail and accompanying check-rail, that there was a menu option somewhere that allowed you to specify which rails of a given template to omit / include - and I can't find this tool in the current version of Templot. Any clues? Regards Chris |
||
posted: 16 Jan 2017 16:52 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Chris Mitton wrote:there was a menu option somewhere that allowed you to specify which rails of a given template to omit / include - and I can't find this tool in the current version of Templot.Hi Chris, do > omit rails and joint marks... menu item, or CTRL+O. It's a child window, so you can leave it showing while you continue working. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 16 Jan 2017 16:55 from: Chris Mitton click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin Wynne wrote: Chris Mitton wrote:Wow, that was quick....and blindingly obvious when you think about itthere was a menu option somewhere that allowed you to specify which rails of a given template to omit / include - and I can't find this tool in the current version of Templot.Hi Chris, Thanks Chris |
||
Please read this important note about copyright: Unless stated otherwise, all the files submitted to this web site are copyright and the property of the respective contributor. You are welcome to use them for your own personal non-commercial purposes, and in your messages on this web site. If you want to publish any of this material elsewhere or use it commercially, you must first obtain the owner's permission to do so. |