|
|||
author | remove search highlighting | ||
---|---|---|---|
posted: 10 Oct 2017 06:49 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
As being new to templot, found the video showing how to convert intersection into diamond. Can you then convert the diamond into a double slip? |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 07:05 from: Stephen Freeman
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Yes but depends on the angles being sensible of course. | ||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 07:10 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
43e042e20647a2d60012e447214bc442.png I'm trying it with the left one, and the angles are really shallow, but I think the one on the right will be tight. But it's only a single slip the 2nd. |
||
Last edited on 10 Oct 2017 07:11 by Damien Morris |
|||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 07:35 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Here is some more info. 7834a39fc13dc2e3abb41f2a4115d582.png 73bce865bedcce572c99c7f5c4661f08.png I am learning how to do the elements I need to design the layout, as there are other things I've yet to figure out how to get right. Like line up 2 different radius, so they meet without a flat edge / kink. Can't attach the box bgs files... |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 08:01 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Sorted, attached. | ||
Attachment: attach_2521_3102_conwaytemplot.box 216 | |||
Last edited on 10 Oct 2017 08:01 by Damien Morris |
|||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 17:33 from: Rob Manchester
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Damien Morris wrote: As being new to templot, found the video showing how to convert intersection into diamond.Hi Damien, You can make double slips directly from the Tools>Make Slip>Make Double Slip menu option. I suspect somebody may come and suggest you practice the basic aspects of Templot before jumping in at the deep end. The track plan you have is from LNWR days ( no date but quite likely circa 1890 ) so you may want to consult later plans if you intend modelling the station in LMS or BR days. Lovely location BTW. Rob |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 17:37 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Rob Manchester wrote:I suspect somebody may come and suggest you practice the basic aspects of Templot before jumping in at the deep end.Hi Rob, Who might that be? I am in fact just making some screenshots to reply to this shortly. Martin. |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 18:21 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Quoting is not easy on this forum, rich text editor is not making my life easier Martin.You can make double slips directly from the Tools>Make Slip>Make Double Slip menu option.Yes true, but I decided to make a diamond from intersection as i'm going over a drawing. I have not yet figured out how to adjust the angles on all 4 parts of a slip. I suspect somebody may come and suggest you practice the basic aspects of Templot before jumping in at the deep end.b94fdb16c6249fcda05eed8275b9dad9.png Dunno, does this count? The track plan you have is from LNWR days ( no date but quite likely circa 1890 ) so you may want to consult later plans if you intend modelling the station in LMS or BR days.4011f6671d6b633b028536d1d0260903.png This image I found, shows a Bedford TJ series? in the background. So Circa 1958-1975, goods yard still there. |
||
Last edited on 10 Oct 2017 18:33 by Damien Morris |
|||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 18:36 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Damien, Welcome to Templot Club. What you have there is an irregular diamond-crossing (crossing angles unequal). It's possible to add slip roads to an irregular diamond-crossing, but it would always be a special by the design office, where space constraints leave no choice. For example a cramped station throat, or a complex junction. It's very unlikely to find one in a goods yard. Further, it is on a curve, requiring that the crossing angle with fixed K-crossings is not flatter than 1:7.5 -- that's a very common size for a slip. Flatter angles* than that require movable K-crossings (switch-diamond) with the extra complications that means in the rodding and interlocking. Again very unlikely in a goods yard, especially in this case where the slip is little more than a set of trap points leading to a short spur headshunt. The NLS don't (yet) have any large-scale maps for this location, so we can't use the new background maps functions in Templot. However, old-maps.co.uk do have a 25"/mile map. Dated 1960, which means it has 100m OS grid lines, making it easier to scale for 2mm/ft. That's the publication date, not the date of survey which is probably around the 1930s. Unfortunately being a commercial operation they require a subscription fee before you can access their maps at a reasonable zoom, and also their maps are scanned to a lower resolution quality than the NLS. I have turned this North for South to match your map: 2_101239_520000000.png 2_101239_530000002.png © old-maps.co.uk I tried matching this, but it required a diamond-crossing of around 1:12, which seems very unlikely. I suspect it may in fact be a pair of turnouts toe-to-toe. Do you have any more photos of the location? I found this one, but it is not clear enough to be sure: conwy_tubular_bridge_train.jpg © linked from http://historypoints.org I found that a B-8 and B-9 turnout fits quite well: 2_101239_530000001.png 2_101239_530000003.png Which strikes me as a more likely fit, assuming the map is accurate. See also this topic: topic 3080 - message 22268 * 1:8 is the maximum, and then only if both roads are straight. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 18:39 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
c84fc0947f3a491d30b8becc0d7ae150.png | ||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 18:43 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
The 1900 is interesting Martin, wagon turn tabel and 2nd exit onto main line. | ||
Last edited on 10 Oct 2017 18:50 by Damien Morris |
|||
posted: posted: 10 Oct 2017 19:03 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Here is my current box bgs Martin. I'm sure I should be doing some transitional curves in this. |
||
Attachment: attach_2522_3102_Conwy.box 208 | |||
10 Oct 2017 19:03 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
and shapes file. | ||
Attachment: attach_2523_3102_conwy.bgs 201 | |||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 19:04 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Damien, Thank you for the photo. That's detailed enough to scale by counting timbers/chairs. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 19:12 from: Rob Manchester
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Goods shed gone before the end of steam traction. Photo by late I.Vaughan trainpassingconwaygoods.jpg I think the photo you added earlier shows the goods shed out of use as the doors appear boarded and the lorry is parked where the track was that ran through it. Rob |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 19:28 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin I've uploaded 5 images to the gallery, really interesting. Rob I have that photo also, and I think that is 70s? Looks like BMC lorry. All the lines nearly all up there. My post shows intact. Narrows it all down though |
||
Last edited on 10 Oct 2017 19:28 by Damien Morris |
|||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 19:39 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
What is really interesting is the diagram shows a pinch / narrowing, and so do the ariel photos in the gallery. Now when I plot them in photoshop to measure, they appear to get too close to adjacent rail, as to block side by side carriage flow. index.proxy.php?cmd=image&image_id=4242 |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 19:51 from: Rob Manchester
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Damien Morris wrote: Martin I've uploaded 5 images to the gallery, really interesting.Damien, Steam had all gone by 1968 so it can't be later than that. Rob |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 19:52 from: John Palmer click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
I downloaded the shapes file and found it to contain 100 bytes only - something wrong there? I think this case illustrates the dangers of excessive reliance on the accuracy of ordnance plans' representations of track layouts. To my way of thinking, the photo in Damien's 18:39 post shows the yard track that ran alongside the Up Main diverging slightly from that running line the closer it gets to the Stephenson bridge, whereas the ordnance plan from old maps suggests instead that at this point the two tracks are converging. If these tracks are, in fact, diverging at this point then the effect would be to increase the angularity of the diamond and make feasible the double slip configuration clearly visible. Looking at the ordnance plan alone might lead you to believe that the crossing angle value is 1 : 8 or shallower. Those curtain walls make a brilliant visual stop for a model! |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 19:54 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
The OS maps you can see they are scans from paper, and the fold line is distorting / kink. Look in the gallery for my areil photos. What draw me to it John, also less to model. As it's nearly 4m wide. |
||
Last edited on 10 Oct 2017 20:04 by Damien Morris |
|||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 20:06 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
John Palmer wrote: I downloaded the shapes file and found it to contain 100 bytes only - something wrong there?Hi John, Damien, Damien you need to upload also the .sk81 image file. The .bgs file contains only the size and position of the picture shape container. It just shows blank white without the matching image file. From the photo you posted it is clearly a bog-standard 1:8 straight-over-straight double slip, and can be created with one click in Templot. tools > make slip. This also brings the goods loop to its proper 10ft minimum way from the running line, which the OS map didn't show correctly. The first turnout into the yard is a very tight 9ft-1:5, presumably to keep the switch off the bridge waybeams: 2_101455_280000000.png regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 20:20 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Thanks Martin. I'm more inclined to trust the LNWR diagram I originally posted, as the ariel photos support it better. The points into the signal depot is very tight, and the dummy vehicle doesn't fit. I'm not clued up on goods rail spacing, is there a reason for 10ft? I've attached the image background, resize to 3833.88mm to match DPI. |
||
Attachment: attach_2525_3102_conwy_templot_3833.88.zip 181 | |||
Last edited on 10 Oct 2017 20:21 by Damien Morris |
|||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 20:32 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Damien, Attach the .sk81 file from your background shapes folder. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 10 Oct 2017 20:43 from: Damien Morris
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
I only see dummy text file in the folders. Edit: NVM found it. |
||
Attachment: attach_2526_3102_conwy.sk81 165 | |||
Last edited on 10 Oct 2017 20:44 by Damien Morris |
Please read this important note about copyright: Unless stated otherwise, all the files submitted to this web site are copyright and the property of the respective contributor. You are welcome to use them for your own personal non-commercial purposes, and in your messages on this web site. If you want to publish any of this material elsewhere or use it commercially, you must first obtain the owner's permission to do so. |