|
|||
author | remove search highlighting | ||
---|---|---|---|
posted: 21 Jul 2020 17:57 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Just doing some housekeeping on the Templot web site, and I came across this: http://templot.com/info/wooden_point_motors_1956.pdf I have no recollection of ever seeing it before, or where it came from. cheers, Martin. |
||
posted: 21 Jul 2020 21:20 from: Bill_Lobb
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Isn't that splendid? Wonder if it would work in 2FS. Bill Martin Wynne wrote: Just doing some housekeeping on the Templot web site, and I came across this: |
||
posted: 21 Jul 2020 22:59 from: John Lewis
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
My guess is that It might have come from Model Raiway News in the 1940s or 1960s. | ||
posted: 21 Jul 2020 23:20 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
John Lewis wrote: My guess is that It might have come from Model Raiway News in the 1940s or 1960s.Hi John, The file name says 1956. The greater mystery is how it came to be on the Templot web site without my having the faintest recollection of it? The file upload date is 2012, so there is no chance of me remembering now. Martin. |
||
posted: 22 Jul 2020 06:34 from: Hayfield
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Reminds me of the DIY articles in all three mags of that era, using either discarded (food mainly) packaging, matchsticks and balsa wood. Was it Railway Modeler that had the "Shows you how" series. Paper Mache and chicken wire featured heavily, with card of off cuts of wood formers | ||
posted: 22 Jul 2020 09:22 from: John Shelley
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin Wynne wrote: John Lewis wrote:[edited message]My guess is that It might have come from Model Raiway News in the 1940s or 1960s.Hi John, To me the style says Railway Modeller, also top right of first page is the word Railway. A look in my Railway library located the May 1956 Railway Modeller with that article on pages 116 & 117. The number 67 top left of the first page is the issue number of that Railway Modeller (Vol 7 No.67). John S from 33820 St Ciers sur Gironde. |
||
posted: 22 Jul 2020 14:02 from: Nigel Brown click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
The author of the article, Sir Eric Hutchison, was a well known modeller of the era and a co-founder of Merco. He wrote quite a few articles for the Railway Modeller, including one of his superb layout based on the Highland Railway main line from Blair Atholl north; it really captured the atmosphere of the line. There's a bio of him here: http://www.brightontoymuseum.co.uk/index/Category:Sir_Eric_Hutchison |
||
posted: 25 Jul 2020 05:59 from: Andrew Barrowman
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin Wynne wrote: Just doing some housekeeping on the Templot web site, and I came across this:Hi Martin, I don't remember seeing it in RM but I don't think I started reading that until 1959. (I was amazed to see it in a news agent's window.) Incidentally, I may be missing something but I don't think it works, at least not for the reasons that the author seemed to think. The two sides are always going to be balanced or more likely not, in which case a single weight is all that's required. What would work I think is if the action of moving the lever elevated a single weight so that it acted like an over-centre spring. I've always imagined full-scale point levers work that way. I've thought of trying it on a model myself but I've yet to get around to it. Maybe on the new layout? Cheers, Andy |
||
posted: 25 Jul 2020 06:58 from: Igor Kurgan
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
I tend to agree with Andy. It is a very interesting design worth to build soon. Indeed a spring is missing(or a locking mechanism), a old fashion clock work can work also without a spring. Best Igor |
||
posted: 25 Jul 2020 08:49 from: Hayfield
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Whilst both weights are the same weight, owing to the pivot point being well off center the force of C will be greater than D. It also suggests adding extra weight if required | ||
posted: 25 Jul 2020 09:16 from: Andrew Barrowman
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hayfield wrote: Whilst both weights are the same weight, owing to the pivot point being well off center the force of C will be greater than D.Hi John, I completely agree. But if all you want to do is exert a force, why do you need two weights when you can achieve exactly the same result with one? It's a "net effect" thing. My old physics teacher in Paisley (who we irreverently nick-named "Bilko" due to his receding hairline) would have had a field day with this one Cheers, Andy |
||
posted: 25 Jul 2020 09:55 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Andrew Barrowman wrote:I completely agree. But if all you want to do is exert a force, why do you need two weights when you can achieve exactly the same result with one?Hi Andy, I'm not sure you can. If you use tension in the operating cord to pull the points over against a single falling weight return, the points aren't trailable when so held over. And it needs some very careful adjustment to the operating cord to hold them against the stock rail with the right amount of force. The beauty of this design is that you can use any old bit of string to lift the weight from the operating crank. The points are held either way by the weights only, and are trailable both ways. cheers, Martin. |
||
posted: 25 Jul 2020 18:12 from: Andrew Barrowman
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin Wynne wrote: Andrew Barrowman wrote:Hi Martin,I completely agree. But if all you want to do is exert a force, why do you need two weights when you can achieve exactly the same result with one?Hi Andy, In the cold light of day I now see where I was going wrong I thought the cord was was attached to the tie-bar and the thing sticking up above the fulcrum was the point lever. Doh! Cheers, Andy |
||
Please read this important note about copyright: Unless stated otherwise, all the files submitted to this web site are copyright and the property of the respective contributor. You are welcome to use them for your own personal non-commercial purposes, and in your messages on this web site. If you want to publish any of this material elsewhere or use it commercially, you must first obtain the owner's permission to do so. |