3D plug track - version 244c and beyond

[Steve_Cornford]

Yes it was the colour that sparked the question, looks a bit like birch ply, but i suppose a bit irrelevant once painted & weathered.

 

[Martin Wynne]

.
The problem with relying on defaults is that you forget to make an essential setting. Having now twice got to the stage of inserting the USB stick in the printer before realising that I had forgotten to set the required rail section, I have added a reminder button:

Will be in 244d.

cheers,

Martin.

 

[Martin Wynne]

Yes it was the colour that sparked the question, looks a bit like birch ply, but i suppose a bit irrelevant once painted & weathered.

@Steve_Cornford

Hi Steve,

To my eye most model timbers are too dark. Real timbers vary a lot, but in yards and sidings they can be quite light in colour after exposure to the elements. A sort of silvery grey with an earthy trace of green and brown:

It's generally easier to darken something which is too light rather than the other way round. Most grey filaments have a blue tinge which looks wrong. The exception is the Jayo "rustic grey" filament which has a greeny tinge which looks better, but it is much too dark.

The "burlywood" colour might be a good starting point. After some streaks with typing correction fluid to represent textured splits and cracks, a thin wash of greeny-grey might look about right. Or maybe not -- I shouldn't be writing this stuff without trying it first.

See also this posted yesterday:

https://www.rmweb.co.uk/forums/topic/111599-penrhos-junctions/?do=findComment&comment=5504928

cheers,

Martin.

 

[Hayfield]

@Hayfield

Hi John,

You asked for some pictures of 7mm/ft scale plug track. Here are a few bits. You know how difficult the resin is to photograph, and no sun today to help. The rail is C&L code 131. The P4 turnout is a B-7 for size comparison.

1 raft of S1 and L1 with solid jaws.

1 raft of S1 and L1 with slots for loose jaws.


View attachment 9257


View attachment 9259


View attachment 9258


View attachment 9260

cheers,

Martin.

Martin

Thank you for posting these, I have everything in place except time to recap and watch a few of James's videos again

Last Saturday at a Scale 7 event I had the pleasure of talking with John Walker at Aubury, whilst to a certain extent John is ploughing his own farrow, his results (resin chairs and laser cut timbers) were for me very encouraging.

Your own photos just confirm what I saw, I must get my act together and watch these videos and get a blackout blind

Again thanks for all you work on this project, its just stunning and in time will be seen as a turning point in track construction

 

[Martin Wynne]

.
Just bumping this diagram from 2 years ago for use on Western Thunder, see:

https://www.westernthunder.co.uk/threads/templot-plug-track-developments.12722/post-301040

Bullhead rail: Templot simplified rail section dimensioning:

Martin.

 

[Martin Wynne]

.
Templot update version 244d is now on the server.

Your copy of Templot should update automatically if you restart it and follow the instructions. There is no need to uninstall your existing copy of Templot.

Martin.

 

[Martin Wynne]

.
Among other new functions in 244d I've mentioned, is this one:

https://85a.uk/templot/club/index.php?posts/10918

which reduces the 7mm/ft plug depth to just under 3mm, matching the 4mm/ft plugs:

Ignoring the note in blue, I'm wondering if the track is built on a slab of expanded polystyrene, would the long loose jaw pins push down into it without needing any preparation? Then turn the track over after assembly and snip them off flush from below.

So much stuff still to try.

More info: https://85a.uk/templot/club/index.php?posts/10918

cheers,

Martin.

 

[Martin Wynne]

.
Just a reminder for those new to plug track who haven't read through the previous 973 pages.

In plug track you don't slide the rail into a chaired timbering base*, as if building a plastic turnout kit.

For the intended way of working instead, see:

https://85a.uk/templot/club/index.php?posts/11201

*unless you have a specific reason to do so -- it's your railway.

Martin.

 

[Martin Wynne]

.
Among other new functions in 244d I've mentioned, is this one:

https://85a.uk/templot/club/index.php?posts/10918

which reduces the 7mm/ft plug depth to just under 3mm, matching the 4mm/ft plugs:

Ignoring the note in blue, I'm wondering if the track is built on a slab of expanded polystyrene, would the long loose jaw pins push down into it without needing any preparation? Then turn the track over after assembly and snip them off flush from below.

So much stuff still to try.

More info: https://85a.uk/templot/club/index.php?posts/10918

cheers,

Martin.

Bug warning.

Sorry, there is a bug in the works with this option.

If printing chairs and loose jaws at the same time, the loose jaws are 7mm scale on width and 4mm scale on height! I forgot to test the option of printing chairs and loose jaws at the same time. Usually the loose jaws are printed on a separate raft to save space, for which the new option above should be unticked.

I will get this fixed and release 244e as soon as possible. edit: now available.

(If you are modelling in 4mm/ft scale, or not using the above option in other scales, this bug has no effect.)

Martin.

 

[Steve_Cornford]

Hi Martin,
Thinking Cap Tuesday heralds another enhancement request.......

In Templot there is the option to display on the trackpad, and also to print a representation of the switch-drive slot (or tie-bar mark)

As part of the geometry of this notional creature, would it be possible to add a couple of user defineable target marks (relative to say the long centreline and the MS end of the tie bar, as these could then be used to drill a pair of fixing holes for servo drive units etc.

For instance here is an example using the required fixing holes for a Makeitminiature servo unit, which are +/-17.5mm away from centreline, and 54mm apart.

I guessed where to add the rectangle as a guide to where to add the two clips, then converted them to targets.

When used for plugtrack bases, I then amended the targets back to clips and revised the rectangle shape to give:-

which when exported as 3D for FDM gave me:-

The idea being that one lays the turnout, drills through the target(clip) holes, then cut-off the now redundant targets (or bury in ballast)

The important factor is being able to define the location of two holes relative to the middle of one end of the switch-drive slot
If one could also define the size of the square hole in this servo fix point, even better.

Could be used with Exactoscale Tortoise mounting plates, MakeitMiniature mounts, Dingo Servo mounts etc, etc.

Oh and while we are about it, can we also add up to two Servo drive targets to the Tie-bar mark, to aid drilling the holes for the actuating rod(s) .

Steve

 

[Martin Wynne]

Hi Martin,
Thinking Cap Tuesday heralds another enhancement request.......

In Templot there is the option to display on the trackpad, and also to print a representation of the switch-drive slot (or tie-bar mark)

As part of the geometry of this notional creature, would it be possible to add a couple of user defineable target marks (relative to say the long centreline and the MS end of the tie bar, as these could then be used to drill a pair of fixing holes for servo drive units etc.

For instance here is an example using the required fixing holes for a Makeitminiature servo unit, which are +/-17.5mm away from centreline, and 54mm apart.
View attachment 9335
I guessed where to add the rectangle as a guide to where to add the two clips, then converted them to targets.

When used for plugtrack bases, I then amended the targets back to clips and revised the rectangle shape to give:-
View attachment 9336
which when exported as 3D for FDM gave me:-
View attachment 9337
The idea being that one lays the turnout, drills through the target(clip) holes, then cut-off the now redundant targets (or bury in ballast)

The important factor is being able to define the location of two holes relative to the middle of one end of the switch-drive slot
If one could also define the size of the square hole in this servo fix point, even better.

Could be used with Exactoscale Tortoise mounting plates, MakeitMiniature mounts, Dingo Servo mounts etc, etc.

Oh and while we are about it, can we also add up to two Servo drive targets to the Tie-bar mark, to aid drilling the holes for the actuating rod(s) .

Steve

@Steve_Cornford

Hi Steve,

Thanks for that. Good to see plug track being experimented with as intended.

It's not as straightforward as it might seem. At present all the brick assemblers (splints, slabs, clips, etc.) are improvised from the background shapes, which means they are referenced from the grid rather than from individual templates. The only way of linking the two at present is via the notch for the clips. Which means, as you have no doubt found, that if you subsequently move a template, a clip doesn't move with it and has to be deleted and re-created.

Ideally the clips and the new objects you mention would belong to, and be referenced from, individual templates instead. I have already been working on that, but not yet got very far with it. We currently have the 2D template symbols, which don't take part in any 3D functions. It might be possible to extend them to include 3D patches (terminology to be confirmed) of various shapes and sizes, which can be added to a template and be part of it when it is moved, curved, etc.

I'm not sure about referencing anything from the current switch drive mark, which is merely a position indicator, and also indicates the hand of a template by being longer at the TS end. Fixing holes for point motors etc. might be better referenced from the slider ribs, of which there can be more than one set in a switch. Someone is also bound to ask about motors for swing-nose crossings, although those are barely known in bullhead. Moveable wing rails (spring crossings) are more common and might be modelled.

I will see what can be done, although it will probably have to wait until bumped to 245a.

p.s. they are digging up the broadband outside here as we speak, and I may be gone for some time...

Martin.

 

[Martin Wynne]

.
Templot update version 244e is now on the server.

Your copy of Templot should update automatically if you restart it and follow the instructions. There is no need to uninstall your existing copy of Templot.

Includes:

see: https://85a.uk/templot/club/index.php?posts/11213

Martin.

 

[Steve_Cornford]

My improved version of using clips to indicate servo fixing points drilling position. Positions calculated relative to S1 timber rather than switch-drive slot. Reduced depth of clips as they are only used to indicate drilling position (in this case of a MakeitMiniature servo mount).

Is there a way in shove timbers to know the absolute twist of timber S1, so that i can twist a rectangle to match the alignment of timber S1. I cheated in above example as it was a straight turnout.
Sorry Martin, just experimenting with what you have given us so far.
Steve

 

[Martin Wynne]

@Hayfield

Ignore this below if modelling in 4mm/ft scale (00/EM/P4).

Returning to the 7mm/ft timbering base, here is a comparison of the normal thickness base (6mm), and the thin-base (3.5mm) option and matching chairs:

This is now working as intended in 244e if this box is ticked:

The advantage of the thin base is obviously that it is faster to print and uses less filament. Or thinner plywood. Also that in FDM it matches up with Peco 0 gauge flexible bullhead track. And it works fine with solid-jaw chairs -- the plug depths and tangs are the same size as for the 4mm/ft chairs and they plug nicely into place.

The BIG disadvantage is that in order to work with loose jaws, the jaw pin needs to be longer than the depth of the timbers, and protrudes below the underside of the track after assembly:

So some means has to be found to get round that:

1. the track is raised up on battens or packing between the chair positions, or

2. a hole or recess is created in the trackbed below each chair, or

3. the track is built on the bench in such a way that there is a clearance for the pins, and track can be turned over after assembly to have the protruding pins trimmed flush.

The latter option needs some thinking about. My best guess so far is to build the track on a slice of stale bread. The pins would push through into it easily. Answers on a postcard for something more practical. I have tried expanded polystyrene, but the surface is too resilient for the pins to penetrate.

It would be fairly simple to FDM-print or laser-cut a disposable spacer base to use below the track during assembly, but in that case you may just as well use the thick base option instead.

or

4. if you want to use the loose jaws, stick with the thick timbering base.

More about this at: https://85a.uk/templot/club/index.php?posts/10950

Martin.

 

[Martin Wynne]

My improved version of using clips to indicate servo fixing points drilling position. Positions calculated relative to S1 timber rather than switch-drive slot. Reduced depth of clips as they are only used to indicate drilling position (in this case of a MakeitMiniature servo mount).
View attachment 9345
Is there a way in shove timbers to know the absolute twist of timber S1, so that i can twist a rectangle to match the alignment of timber S1. I cheated in above example as it was a straight turnout.
Sorry Martin, just experimenting with what you have given us so far.
Steve

@Steve_Cornford

Hi Steve,

As I mentioned, currently it is not straightforward.

I think possibly your best option at present is to add a bonus timber. Use it to position the clips, and then omit it from the export:

After adding it, set zero on S1, and then on B1 set the centre spacing back (negative) to the hole positions. Adjust the length and throw to get the ends of the bonus timber at the hole centres. Then manually position the clips over the ends of the bonus timber.

The bonus timber will move and curve with the template. But don't forget to omit it before exporting.

I will see about getting a proper function done to put such fixing holes in defined positions.

---

To find the angle at the S1 timber, slide the peg along the main road centre-line (CTRL+F8) until it is over the centre of S1, and then look in the info panel:

(Add or subtract any twist applied to S1 in the shove timbers.)

Martin.

 

[John Walker]

.
Just a reminder for those new to plug track who haven't read through the previous 973 pages.

In plug track you don't slide the rail into a chaired timbering base*, as if building a plastic turnout kit.

For the intended way of working instead, see:

https://85a.uk/templot/club/index.php?posts/11201

*unless you have a specific reason to do so -- it's your railway.

Martin.

Hello Martin

I have quoted you as above on my web site before embarking on my wayward journey.

Regards
John Walker

 

[PeteT]

Hi Martin,

I'm currently finalising a design for the Scalefour Jubilee Layout challenge. The original plan was Exactoscale chairs, but as between the 2 of us on the project we have a laser cutter and resin printer we are looking at the plug track option. It has several benefits with the way we are planning on constructing the layout.

I've currently got 2 issues - both shown in the below. Sorry if this is covered it a video that I haven't seen.

Firstly on the crossover, I have lengthened sleepers to cover both tracks - but I can't see an option to add the extra 2 chairs?

Secondly, on the single slip, it has added chairs for most of the diamond, but not converted a few of these to slide chairs and the central section of the crossing has been left unimplemented.

Are these known gaps in the current implementation? or is there something I can do in either case?

Initially we're looking at doing some staging roads which don't have either of these issues, but would be good to know whether these are known gaps (I appreciate this is a hobby!).

Also, do the chair heights match with Exactoscale chairs? so if either of these are not implemented when we get to it, would we be able to implement plug track where feasible and fill in the gaps with Exactoscale?

Thanks,
Pete

 

[Terry Downes]

Hi Pete, K crossing chairs are not currently within the Plug Track arsenal but, a good substitute is explained in the video on the 29th March.I think this is the link. http://c7514493.myzen.co.uk/mp4/zoom_meeting_28_mar_2024.mp4

 

[Terry Downes]

To add the missing chais I would suggest extending the plain track by a couple of sleepers and shove the sleepers along to cover your extended timbers then hide the outline of the plain track sleepers. This is done within the shove timbers dialogue box. Good Luck.

 

[Hayfield]

Pete

One of the tests I want to do is to build a diamond using Exactoscale chairs for the obtuse crossing. In one of the Templot chats Martin showed how to adapt chairs from the common crossings, but well above my paygrade

Personally I cannot see any issues with slips other than adapting Exactoscale chairs on blank (plug holeless) timbers, bact to a bit of modelmaking

 

[Martin Wynne]

@PeteT

Hi Pete,

Welcome to Templot Club.

Firstly on the crossover, I have lengthened sleepers to cover both tracks - but I can't see an option to add the extra 2 chairs?

Extend the long timbers across to the full width from one template to the opposite one, and on the opposite template click the hide outline button for each conflicting timber. This will remove the unwanted timber but retain its chairs, which will then be captured by the extended long timber. If the captured chairs are the standard interchangeable chairs (S1, L1, P, CC, etc.) they can be shoved along to align them centrally on the extended timber.

Here timber A1 has had its outline hidden, and its chairs are being shoved along over the extended timber from the template below. Timber A2 has already had that process done.

(A2 has also had its chair heaved to L1 to avoid a conflict.)

Secondly, on the single slip, it has added chairs for most of the diamond, but not converted a few of these to slide chairs and the central section of the crossing has been left unimplemented.

The chairs for K-crossings are not yet available -- this whole experimental project is still a work-in-progress.

The P slide chairs can be added to the slip switch partial templates using the chair heaving functions. The underlying plain chairs on the half-diamond templates will need to be omitted. However, you are jumping way ahead of where we have got to -- the chair heaving functions were added only recently, are still incomplete, and haven't yet been fully explained:

All this will be possible eventually but we are not there yet.

Martin.

 

[Steve_Cornford]

Hi Pete,
In the position where you extended the timbers, I think you might have used the omit option on the timbers on the other template (which omits the chairs as well) rather than using the hide outline option which leaves the chairs you need on the rail to be captured by the extended timbers.
If that is the case, you can re-instate the omitted timbers, then use hide outline option to get rd of the timbers but leave the chairs.
With the hidden timber still selected, You then might need to use backwards/forwards option (rather than crab), toposition the chairs nicely over the extended timbers.
Steve

 

[Martin Wynne]

@Steve_Cornford

Hi Steve,

As I mentioned, currently it is not straightforward.

I think possibly your best option at present is to add a bonus timber. Use it to position the clips, and then omit it from the export:


View attachment 9349

After adding it, set zero on S1, and then on B1 set the centre spacing back (negative) to the hole positions. Adjust the length and throw to get the ends of the bonus timber at the hole centres. Then manually position the clips over the ends of the bonus timber.

The bonus timber will move and curve with the template. But don't forget to omit it before exporting.

I will see about getting a proper function done to put such fixing holes in defined positions.

---

To find the angle at the S1 timber, slide the peg along the main road centre-line (CTRL+F8) until it is over the centre of S1, and then look in the info panel:

View attachment 9350

(Add or subtract any twist applied to S1 in the shove timbers.)

Martin.

@Steve_Cornford

Hi Steve,

Just to add that you can reduce the bonus timber to a single centre-line by setting its width to zero.

Martin.

 

[Phil G]

The latter option needs some thinking about. My best guess so far is to build the track on a slice of stale bread. The pins would push through into it easily. Answers on a postcard for something more practical. I have tried expanded polystyrene, but the surface is too resilient for the pins to penetrate.

Hi Martin, may I suggest a phenolic foam sheet or block, better known as floral foam block.
you can get this from most local florists, or even cheaper if you use Ali-express or Temu.
cheers
Phil

 

[Steve_Cornford]

Hi Martin,
As it is raining here in Brighton, I have been enjoying a Templot learning experience!

Rainy day question
As far as rectangle shapes are concerned, if i call the point at which the diagonals intersect the centre of gravity , would i be right in assuming that when you twist a rectangle shape Templot applies the rotation about the c.o.g.

Steve

 

[Martin Wynne]

Hi Martin,
As it is raining here in Brighton, I have been enjoying a Templot learning experience!

Rainy day question
As far as rectangle shapes are concerned, if i call the point at which the diagonals intersect the centre of gravity , would i be right in assuming that when you twist a rectangle shape Templot applies the rotation about the c.o.g.

Steve

@Steve_Cornford

Hi Steve,

If you twist a rectangle background shape, yes. But note that Templot retains the original untwisted corner co-ordinates. Which makes it tricky to modify the size after twisting using the corner1 or corner2 mouse actions, or using the change dimensions... button. It's best to set the required size of a rectangle before twisting it.

If you rotate a rectangle background shape, the entire shape is rotated about a different centre location, which can be set at:

Rectangle sketchboard items work differently, twisting and sizing being done by dragging the sizing handles in the usual Windows way.

p.s. I see from the radar that you are sending your rain this way. No thanks.

Martin.

 

[Martin Wynne]

.
Advance warning.

I'm currently working on the chair base outlines for the XN , XA , AA , AB , BB crossing chairs.

As you remember I temporarily kludged these as 4-sided chairs with a width of 9.1/2".

To match the prototype these should be 8-sided chairs with an end-width of 8" and a mid-width of 10.1/2". I'm now working on these. Changing the code to permit 8-sided chairs is going to be a massive task, which is my own fault for not allowing for it in the first place. But it has got to be done in preparation for the slab & bracket chairs.

Consequently the plugs on these chairs will be narrower than before. This is a good thing because there will be less risk of the socket corners breaking through the timber sides.

But the upshot is that these existing chairs XN , XA , AA , AB , BB made using existing versions of Templot will not fit in sockets made using the next version 245a. Chairs for those will need to be made using 245a too.

So this is an advance warning to make all the timbering bases you need for your existing crossing chairs before updating to 245a.

edit: this change is deferred until after we have released open-source Templot5.

This does not affect the interchangeable chairs S1 etc. or the switch chairs. Only the above V-crossing chairs. If you are not sure which are these chairs, you can see them showing for rail 3 in the chair heaving:

Martin.

 

[Steve_Cornford]

Hi Martin,
I hope you have been out & about enjoying this fine weather, and recharging your batteries.
Although it might seem like a massive task, as a fellow programmer (retired) I often found that once you get started, things have a habit of dropping into place and you get to see light at the end of the tunnel.
Sorry must have been out in the sun too much today and triggered my cliche syndrome.
Steve

 

[Steve_Cornford]

Hi Martin,
In trying to create a couple of opposing interlaced turnouts (as featured in part of Wimbledon goods yard) I think I have uncovered a feature.
I widened three timbers in the middle section of my design (T2,T1,S11), and when exported the right hand side (N-flanges) of timbers T3,T2,T1 and S11 seem to have dissappeared. I did not switch them off.

I have attached the box file
Steve

 

[Martin Wynne]

@Steve_Cornford

Hi Steve,

I think there is a bug in this new function. Someone else reported something similar. I haven't yet got round to looking into it:

Try unticking that box.

Thanks for reporting it.

Martin.

 

[Steve_Cornford]

Hi Martin,
Yes , unticking that box fixed the problem thank you.
Steve

 

[KHC1]

And on the subject of loose jaws. Are the jaws specific to each chair type or are they universal.

Keith

 

[Martin Wynne]

And on the subject of loose jaws. Are the jaws specific to each chair type or are they universal.

Keith

@KHC1

Hi Keith,

The outer jaws are colour-coded in the list:

Jaws of the same colour are interchangeable on different chairs (for the same rail, if there is more than one rail in the chair).

So for example the SC outer jaws (pink) can be used on several chairs (on the running rail only).

The coloured jaws can be printed in bulk and kept in stock for track building.

Jaws shown in black are unique to one specific chair on one specific template and can't be used for any other chair anywhere else. (That's not strictly true for switches and crossings of the same size and angle and type and hand with the same timbering style on timbers which haven't been shoved -- but the ifs and buts are too involved to explain and it's better to assume they are unique.)

Loose jaws are available with keys driven in opposite directions. For S1 and S1J chairs adjacent to rail joints, you need to use the correct S1 (green) jaw to leave room between the keys for the fishplates.

cheers,

Martin.

 

[KHC1]

Thanks Martin for the above. Now I seam to have a couple of other issues. No doubt it probably finger trouble on my behalf. I am working on an EM B6 a couple of days ago I managed to export this into two sections to fit my printer. However I mucked up and was missing two sleepers right in the middle. So this morning I have Triest do the piece with the two missing sleepers. But after doing it three times I am getting the following error.

I export the file and in 3D builder when I open the image andimport I get this.

I then do repair and get this.

I have also tried importing the raw file into my Pursa slicing software and doing repair then and again the above happens.

My other problem is no doubt my finger trouble. The template I get on screen has the timbers straight on but when I export the file I get is with the timbers on an angle.

Keith

 

[Steve_Cornford]

Hi Keith,
If you start with an EM B6 with straight timbering,then switch on experimental chairing, you wi se that the crossing timbering gets changed to angled timbering. This happens for B6 and below to accommodate the plugtrack chairing.
I suspect also that you have got a mixture of templates, with and without chairing in your box file to get the results you are showing.
Any chance you can save the box file a d post it on here so that we can have a look at it and ad use further?
Steve

 

[KHC1]

Thanks Steve will do a box file later and I will look into doing a B7 just to see the change.

Keith

 

[Steve_Cornford]

Here is B6 before switching on chairing:

now with experimental chairing switched on:-

In fact it switches to angled for B6.5 and below. B7 and above stays straight.
Steve

 

[Martin Wynne]

In fact it switches to angled for B6.5 and below. B7 and above stays straight.

@Steve_Cornford @KHC1

Hi Steve, Keith,

It's below 1:6 if you are using press-fit* sockets. So that would be a way of getting a B-6 square-on if it was essential. But using square-on timbering for such short turnouts is not really prototypical, because the prototype would have the same problem of angled chairs with screws too close to the edge of the timber.

There is a lot more work to be done on this in Templot. It's not needed if the relevant timbers are widened to 14", and for partial templates in complex formations it can cause problems with shifted check rails. Meaning more work in splitting extra partial templates.

So much still to do, and so much explaining to cover it all.

Now that I have posted the chairing code open-source, everyone can see what is happening:

In math_unit.pas, line 3248:

  if exp_chairing=True
     then begin
            if (dxf_form.clip_fit_radio.Checked=True) or (dxf_form.snap_fit_radio.Checked=True)
               then force_eq:=(k3n<6.99)     // 241b   force equalized to fit long 3D sockets on xing timbers  clip-fit or snap-fit (undercut sockets)
               else force_eq:=(k3n<5.99);    // 239b   force equalized to fit long 3D sockets on xing timbers  press-fit (plain sockets)
          end
     else force_eq:=False;

*but that would apply to the entire DXF/STL file.

p.s. originally equalized timbering was the default in Templot. I was persuaded to change it to square-on against my better judgement. Now with the chairing available I'm minded to change the default setting back to equalized.

cheers,

Martin.

 

[KHC1]

Hi Steve,
Hopefully attached box file

 

[Martin Wynne]

@KHC1 @Steve_Cornford

Hi Keith,

Thanks for posting that.

You have two templates in your storage box, one with chairing switched on and one without. If you delete or wipe the one without chairing (template no.1 in the box), the problem should go away.

However, you have found a bug. Templates with experimental chairing switched off should not be exported in 3D if the timbers only buttons have been selected.

(They can be exported if the CAD button is selected.)

Thanks for finding and reporting it. I will get it fixed.

cheers,

Martin.