Martin Wynne
Admin
- Location
- West of the Severn UK
- Info
.
Following on from the topic about building kits on Templot plans.
It's difficult to think about a new concept without having a name for it. So we need that first.
We already have "group" for a transient collection of templates. Words such as "collection", "combination", "assembly" emphasize the multiplicity of the contents rather than the singularity of the whole. We already have background "shapes" and sketchboard "items" and timbering "bricks" and the storage "box".
In the CAD world the usual term would be "block". But literally that suggests rectangularity and thickness, which doesn't seem quite right for this idea. Also it can get confusing if misunderstood as a verb.
Here is my short list of possibles. Do any of these sound right? I'm hoping that it could apply to any assembly of templates, not just say a double-slip kit, which could be moved and aligned as one (you can do that now with groups of course, but only one at a time, created for the purpose), and hopefully curved as one (you can't do that with groups).
Imagine designing a goods yard on a curve, and then needing to curve the whole thing a little bit more, and doing that in one go without starting again from scratch. I think I can see a way of doing such a thing -- which would be worth having quite apart from any consideration of combined partial templates for kit-building.
goods yard mat
goods yard knot
goods yard patch
goods yard footprint
goods yard lump
double-slip mat
double-slip knot
double-slip patch
double-slip footprint
double-slip lump
Any more? I'm currently leaning towards "patch". A dialog called the patch list sounds reasonable. A mouse action to curve patch looks in keeping. A button labelled convert group to patch would be par for the course.
cheers,
Martin.
Following on from the topic about building kits on Templot plans.
We would need a method of combining several partial templates into a single entity. We would need a name for such an entity. We would need a listing of such entities, and a whole new set of functions to select them and join them, and maybe curve them. And a means to split them back into their partial templates when necessary. And probably a new file format to contain them.
It's difficult to think about a new concept without having a name for it. So we need that first.
We already have "group" for a transient collection of templates. Words such as "collection", "combination", "assembly" emphasize the multiplicity of the contents rather than the singularity of the whole. We already have background "shapes" and sketchboard "items" and timbering "bricks" and the storage "box".
In the CAD world the usual term would be "block". But literally that suggests rectangularity and thickness, which doesn't seem quite right for this idea. Also it can get confusing if misunderstood as a verb.
Here is my short list of possibles. Do any of these sound right? I'm hoping that it could apply to any assembly of templates, not just say a double-slip kit, which could be moved and aligned as one (you can do that now with groups of course, but only one at a time, created for the purpose), and hopefully curved as one (you can't do that with groups).
Imagine designing a goods yard on a curve, and then needing to curve the whole thing a little bit more, and doing that in one go without starting again from scratch. I think I can see a way of doing such a thing -- which would be worth having quite apart from any consideration of combined partial templates for kit-building.
goods yard mat
goods yard knot
goods yard patch
goods yard footprint
goods yard lump
double-slip mat
double-slip knot
double-slip patch
double-slip footprint
double-slip lump
Any more? I'm currently leaning towards "patch". A dialog called the patch list sounds reasonable. A mouse action to curve patch looks in keeping. A button labelled convert group to patch would be par for the course.
cheers,
Martin.
message ref: 4513