|
|||
author | remove search highlighting | ||
---|---|---|---|
posted: 16 May 2012 00:50 from: Andrew Fendick
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
When creating a diamond crossing the check rails where the two half diamonds meet are not generated if the V crossing angle is greater than 1:8. I am using Templot Dev 2.05.b. OS is Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit on AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-60 processor. Gauge is set to EM 18.2mm. I created a new template, REA B-8 Left hand turnout 10 Chains Radius. I then changed the V Crossing angle to 1:9. I then did tools > make simple crossover. Then template > convert turnout to half-diamond. The check rails and gap that should be produced at the point where the two half diamonds would meet are not generated. In the attached box file the two lower sets of track are from a 1:9 regular and generic turnout and have not produced the check rails, whereas the top one is 1:8 and has. 32_151949_370000000.png |
||
Attachment: attach_1446_1960_DiamondCrossings.box 301 | |||
Last edited on 16 May 2012 00:53 by Andrew Fendick |
|||
posted: 16 May 2012 01:00 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Andrew, Fixed K-crossings are not prototypically correct at angles flatter than 1:8, and would be extremely unreliable if modelled as such. Switch-diamonds (movable K-crossings) are used instead, and Templot draws them as such, like this: fb_movablek_dslip.jpg © thanks to Mick Nicholson An excellent picture from Mick Nicholson showing a flat-bottom double-slip with movable K-crossings. Templot is drawing a switch-diamond instead (i.e. movable K-crossings) because that is what is required at this angle. Here are a couple of images to help explain: switch_diamond_10bh.jpg © PWI switch_diamond.jpg © PWI regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 16 May 2012 01:06 from: Andrew Fendick
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Thanks very much for that information Martin. Sorry to have troubled you. | ||
posted: 16 May 2012 07:08 from: Stephen Freeman
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi, A small point but the timbering appears to be slightly different from Bullhead to Flatbottom. Does Templot correct this or is some timber manipulation called for? |
||
posted: 16 May 2012 13:07 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Borg-Rail wrote:A small point but the timbering appears to be slightly different from Bullhead to Flatbottom. Does Templot correct this or is some timber manipulation called for?Hi Stephen, Yes. Bullhead switch-diamonds have a single timber at the centre carrying both switch tips. Flat-bottom switch-diamonds have two separate timbers close together. Templot draws the timbering accordingly, and has done since the half-diamond templates were first introduced in version 0.78.e I think you could have easily answered this question yourself with a little experimenting. There are some detailed notes about K-crossing timbering at real > timbering > half-diamond timbering > ? half-diamond timbering - help menu item. It's not straightforward. Since the changes for irregular diamonds in Templot2, the timbering of short angle diamonds needs some further work. In the meantime if necessary use the shove timber functions to match your prototype. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 16 May 2012 18:34 from: Paul Boyd
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi MartinSince the changes for irregular diamonds in Templot2, the timbering of short angle diamonds needs some further work. In the meantime if necessary use the shove timber functions to match your prototype. I wonder if it would just be easier to switch off timbering for short angle diamonds? The GWR used baulk timbers for less than 1:2, for instance, which I could never expect Templot to automatically generate. I remember you said once that one reason for not having very short diamonds in Templot is that the timbering gets complex - not if it's turned off, it's not! There would of course have to be a warning, and a way of turning them back on, but the very fact of that would be a subtle clue that the user is trying to do something unusual and is pretty much on their own. You could then go down to 1:0.001 angles, maybe (avoiding any "Divide by zero" errors along the way!!) Cheers |
||
posted: 17 May 2012 00:26 from: Terry Flynn
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Martin, I agree it is desirable not to make fixed K crossings above 1:8 for most model railway situations however there are many prototypes that used fixed K crossings larger than 1:8 such as the NSWGR. Is it possible to to have an option to allow fixed K crossings above 1:8 to cover all prototype possibilities. A suitable warning could be included about using the option. Terry Flynn. |
||
posted: 17 May 2012 01:39 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Terry Flynn wrote:Is it possible to to have an option to allow fixed K crossings above 1:8 to cover all prototype possibilities.Hi Terry, Sure. Click the real > K-crossing options > fixed K-crossings menu option to override the automatic setting. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 17 May 2012 04:20 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Paul Boyd wrote:I remember you said once that one reason for not having very short diamonds in Templot is that the timbering gets complex - not if it's turned off, it's not!Hi Paul, Well yes and no. I do feel that the current 1:1.5 limit* is the sensible minimum for the present generator algorithm. It will go shorter, but would need a knowledgeable user to understand what they are seeing and adjust things accordingly. There are check rail conflicts, truncated wing rails, and other artefacts to correct for. And the prototype varies so much that it's impossible for Templot to know what to do about them by itself. I'm afraid a lot of my design decisions nowadays are based not on providing extra functionality but on minimizing support requests. You have only to look at this very topic to see how even the essential functions can confuse some users. *was 1:2 in 091c. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 17 May 2012 22:25 from: Paul Boyd
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Martin It was worth mentioning!! When someone wants to do this... 105_171719_120000000.png ...I think it's safe to say that Templot can never predict what is needed. I'm afraid a lot of my design decisions nowadays are based not on providing extra functionality but on minimizing support requests.Am I allowed to say that I think SketchBoard is extra functionality? You have only to look at this very topic to see how even the essential functions can confuse some users.Yes - I guess you're plugging away at the Help pages at the moment! |
||
posted: 18 May 2012 20:27 from: Phil O
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Paul Boyd wrote: Hi MartinAt least it's not Retford, as the trackwork for that is mostly finished. Cheers Phil |
||
Last edited on 18 May 2012 20:28 by Phil O |
Please read this important note about copyright: Unless stated otherwise, all the files submitted to this web site are copyright and the property of the respective contributor. You are welcome to use them for your own personal non-commercial purposes, and in your messages on this web site. If you want to publish any of this material elsewhere or use it commercially, you must first obtain the owner's permission to do so. |