|
|||
author | remove search highlighting | ||
---|---|---|---|
posted: 26 Jan 2009 16:41 from: richard_t
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
On an interesting thread on RMweb, Camberhurst (P4) - 10800's proposed home layout, you've written:For diamonds and slips converting to CLM is all you need to do to match P4 Track Co designs. However, for turnouts it's more important also to change from a regular type V-crossing to a generic type (template > V-crossing options... menu item), as that does make a noticeable difference to the lead length. But only for sizes up to the natural sizes -- A7, B8, C10, etc. Stay with the regular type crossing where the angle is flatter than natural for the switch -- A8, B9, B10, C11, etc. Is this a general thing or just for P4 Track Co designs? (I'm planning some BS110 curved turnouts which are CLM based.) Richard.(Having just found references to BS116A flat bottom rail!) |
||
posted: 26 Jan 2009 17:30 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
richard_t wrote: On an interesting thread on RMweb, Camberhurst (P4) - 10800's proposed home layout, you've written: Hi Richard, It's a general thing, but depends on your prototype drawing. If the drawing shows the turnout curve terminating at the fine point (gauge intersection, CTRL-4), use a generic V-crossing. If the drawing shows a straight section in front of the V-crossing, use a regular V-crossing and set the required entry-straight length. Introducing a straight section in front of the V-crossing shortens the lead length -- the prototype sometimes does this on natural and sub-natural sizes where space constraints dictate and changing the crossing angle is not possible. In version 091c you can adjust the entry-straight by mouse action to see the effect and shorten the turnout as required (action > mouse actions: real > adjust V-crossing entry straight menu item). Templot defaults to a regular type crossing anyway, so that the rails are symmetrical at the knuckle for easier building and smoother running. The shorter lead also saves a bit of space. But the options are there to match the prototype exactly in P4/S7 etc. if you wish. regards, Martin. |
||
posted: 26 Jan 2009 19:49 from: richard_t
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Of course - thats what all the tables are for in British Railways Track (ed 3 and 5), with which type of turnouts they are (ed 3: page 117 onwards, ed 5: page 108 onwards). D'oh Thanks again. |
||
Please read this important note about copyright: Unless stated otherwise, all the files submitted to this web site are copyright and the property of the respective contributor. You are welcome to use them for your own personal non-commercial purposes, and in your messages on this web site. If you want to publish any of this material elsewhere or use it commercially, you must first obtain the owner's permission to do so. |