|
|||
author | remove search highlighting | ||
---|---|---|---|
posted: 12 Jul 2009 10:34 from: BTuckey click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
I am revisiting my Terminus design to try to get the trackwork to 'flow' more smoothly. On the prototype, when a crossing of say 1:8.2 was encountered, did they build it to this angle or use the nearest 'standard' of 1:8 or 1:8.5 and realign the surrounding track? Cheers, Brian |
||
Last edited on 12 Jul 2009 23:14 by BTuckey |
|||
posted: 15 Jul 2009 22:29 from: Rob Haskins click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Brian According to British Railway Track Design, Construction and Maintenance 1956 reprint the crossing angles to be found in standard leads is as follows:- ex GWR 1 in 8, 8.25 or 8.5, ex LMS, LNER and SR 8 or 9. These crossings being manufactured from bull head rail. In flat bottom work the choice is between 8 and 8.5. In all likelyhood these ex company standards were adhered to after nationalisation. It would be my assumption that Pway designers would have been encouraged to use standard crossing angles and amending the plain line to suit. Regards, Rob BTuckey wrote: I am revisiting my Terminus design to try to get the trackwork to 'flow' more smoothly. On the prototype, when a crossing of say 1:8.2 was encountered, did they build it to this angle or use the nearest 'standard' of 1:8 or 1:8.5 and realign the surrounding track? |
||
posted: 15 Jul 2009 22:47 from: BTuckey click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Thanks Rob. I didn't know if each instance was a bespoke design and build or whether they had a stock of common components. You have answered the question! Cheers, Brian |
||
posted: 15 Jul 2009 23:05 from: Martin Wynne
click the date to link to this post click member name to view archived images |
Hi Brian, The standard REA crossing angles are on the Templot web site at: http://www.templot.com/martweb/templot_forum.htm#xing_data regards, Martin. |
||
Please read this important note about copyright: Unless stated otherwise, all the files submitted to this web site are copyright and the property of the respective contributor. You are welcome to use them for your own personal non-commercial purposes, and in your messages on this web site. If you want to publish any of this material elsewhere or use it commercially, you must first obtain the owner's permission to do so. |